用户名:  密码:   
美国华裔教授专家网留言簿
博客导航 — 美国华裔教授专家网>博客留言簿
关键字  范围   
全部留言读者评论个人留言
共12652条留言,每页10条,当前第209/1266页
【首页】【前页】[201] [202] [203] [204] [205] [206] [207] [208] [209] [210] 【后页】【末页】
第  页  
I m 留言于2016-02-18 23:21:35
评论:UPDATE - From The Chinese American Professors and Professionals Network (2016 No.5)
感谢姜老师,正月快乐!万事如意!身体健康!
编辑读者评论
老郎中 留言于2016-02-18 15:57:56
评论:阎学通: 中国有多少本钱可以跟美国叫板?
閰先生說得好!
實現中華民族復興的中國夢
百年太久,只爭朝夕
某種意義上,1949年10月1日中華民族已開始復興
歷盡滄桑,艱苦奮發,自強不息.和平發展.
我們這一代定能看到(今年我78啦)
巍巍的大中華...
编辑读者评论
南灣台灣同鄉會 留言于2016-02-18 07:44:10
评论:UPDATE - From The Chinese American Professors and Professionals Network (2016 No.5)
元宵節是台灣重要傳統民俗節慶之一,更是年中盛事。南灣台灣同鄉會舉辦的元宵花燈會旨在發揚台灣的傳統節日文化,使主流社會及華裔小朋友感受元宵喜慶的祥和氛圍。南灣台灣同鄉會期許透過元宵節的各種民俗活動,使小朋友對於這些傳統的活動有所體會及了解,進而提昇小朋友對於台灣文化的關心,使這些台灣的民俗活動能夠繼績傳承下去。
2016元宵花燈會精採內容: 台灣夜市,益智童玩,趣味登迷,精採節目,祈龜,獎不完
提燈籠:元宵節又稱燈籠節,而元宵節的晚上,讓孩子們去外面提燈籠,更是元宵節的中心活動。古時候的私塾自春節前放年假,要到正月十五日才開學,而學童開學當天最重要的工作就是「開燈」。「開燈」即是由學生家長準備好一盞精巧的燈籠,交由學生帶到私塾,由博學的老師替他點燃起來,再由學生提著,以象徵其前途光明的吉祥意味。然而這種學校「開燈」的吉祥習俗,慢慢的演變成了元宵孩子們提燈籠的風俗。
猜燈謎: 以往燈謎都在寺廟裡舉行,因為寺廟乃民眾閒暇時聚集的場所,而且有花燈競賽與展示,所以從前都在花燈下榜上一個謎面,到元宵夜由廟裡相關人員主持猜燈謎,場面熱鬧而溫馨,因為可以得個獎品回家,算是小過年的吉祥兆頭。演變至今,元宵節猜燈謎拿大獎,已是我國的傳統習俗,也是各活動的主辦單位在當天必備的活動單元之一。
乞龜: 台灣的許多寺廟,也在元宵節舉行「乞龜」的活動,以作為慶祝。所謂「乞龜」,就是由廟方準備由糯米或麵粉製成烏龜擺在廟前。元宵節當天可由信徒擲筊乞回,讓家人「吃平安」。乞得麵龜的人家,明年元宵必須還給廟方一個更大的麵龜。本活動也備有麵龜,讓鄉親可以許願,並祈求來年有個吉祥如意的一年。
活動時間: 2016/02/20 5PM-9PM
活動地點: 南灣文教中心新址
地址: 100 S. Milpitas Blvd., Milpitas, CA 95035
報名專線: 408-646-4153 ; 408 677-6855
附註: 現場以手機facebook打卡可得一張摸彩券。現場有童子軍協助。須有Facebook 帳號。
编辑读者评论
卓越 留言于2016-02-18 07:34:48
评论:UPDATE - From The Chinese American Professors and Professionals Network (2016 No.5)
最近​灣區華人社區炒得沸沸揚揚的各家保險公司的新春賀禮‘高紅利高回報promotion​’,真是讓人霧裡看花目不暇​接!到底哪些財務計畫是真真切切?哪些是隐藏玄機?​​
1,​新​春​送大禮倒數​5​天! 22%開戶紅利零風險零费用! 但有無弊端?
​2,​每年保證10%​回報​​,共​增值10年​,保證​双倍​回報! 但有無局限?​
3,報稅季節,各種信托&稅務優惠!但有無限制?
本週​末​2/​20 & 2/​21​@2​pm【局限?弊端?隱藏?如何避免年金陷阱​​?】講座​。
報名​電話:1-877-253-8288 or 電郵至​Jenny@EliteWealths.com
编辑读者评论
Kim 留言于2016-02-18 07:31:15
评论:UPDATE - From The Chinese American Professors and Professionals Network (2016 No.5)
Thank you!

Elaine
编辑读者评论
UCLA CCS 留言于2016-02-18 07:29:45
评论:UPDATE - From The Chinese American Professors and Professionals Network (2016 No.5)
A City of Workers, A City for Workers? Beijing Urban Space in the 1950s
Thursday, February 18, 2016, 4:00 PM - 5:30 PM
Bunche Hall 10383, UCLA
Talk by Fabio Lanza, University of Arizona
Immediately after Beijing’s “peaceful liberation” in 1949, Chinese planners and leaders conjured up the idea of a capital city that could fulfill three different but theoretically inseparable functions: it should be a productive city, with a sizeable modern industrial proletariat; it should host a vast centralized bureaucracy; and it should be remade into a more perfect structure, in which the needs of the people (the newly industrialized working masses) could be finally satisfied and the people themselves remade into new socialist individuals. Documents of the Beijing government in the 1950s indicate that these three functions proved to be in the end incompatible. Socialist “city construction” became realized in a form of and urban modernization that was antithetical to any radical change in the lives of the working people and to any step towards a more equalitarian organization of society. While in the 1950s Beijing was indeed being transformed into a city of workers, it was not becoming a city for workers.

This presentation traces the increasing distance, through the 1950s, between the projects of the planners and practices at street level, showing how the contradictions of Beijing’s urban space were intrinsic to some of the basic concepts that animated the early PRC, such as “development,” “modernization,” and “production.” But it also illustrates how the city government (and Beijing residents) never stopped trying to solve these tensions, leading to the creation of new forms of urban organizations, from the danwei in the early 1950s to the urban communes of the Great Leap Forward.

Fabio Lanza (Ph.D. Columbia University, 2004) is associate professor of modern Chinese history in the Departments of History and East Asian Studies of the University of Arizona. His main research interests are political movements and urban history of twentieth-century China. He is the author of Behind the Gate: Inventing Students in Beijing (Columbia University Press, 2010) and co-editor (with Jadwiga Pieper-Mooney) of De-Centering Cold War History Local and Global Change (Routledge, 2013).
He has recently completed a manuscript on Maoism, Asian Studies and intellectual activism in the U.S. and France and has just started a new project on Beijing urban space under Maoism.
编辑读者评论
聲援梁彼得 留言于2016-02-18 03:00:26
评论:UPDATE - From The Chinese American Professors and Professionals Network (2016 No.5)
聲援梁彼得 2月20日全美35城市 華人遊行 (南加州地區:洛杉磯City Hall, 11:00 A.M. ; 及 Irvine City Hall)
聲援梁警官:向檢察長Kenneth Thompson 寄發的申訴信樣本
向檢察長KENNETH THOMPSON 申訴的方式: 信件可寄到: DA Kenneth Thompson Brooklyn District Attorney's Office 350 Jay Street 16th Floor Brooklyn, New York 11201 Hotline: 718-250-2340
推特聯络方式: twitter.com/brooklynda 臉書聯络方式: FACEBOOK : Brooklyn DA Thompson
法官聯络方式: 寄信到法官辦公室 Chambers of the Honorable Danny Chun Supreme Court of the State of New York County of Kings 320 Jay Street, 19th Floor Brooklyn, New York 11201


Honorable Kenneth Thompson

Brooklyn District Attorney's Office
350 Jay Street, 16th Floor,
Brooklyn, New York 11201

RE: People v. Peter Liang
Indictment No. 9988/2014

Dear Honorable Thompson,

I am very disappointed that your office decided to indict Office Peter Liang, a young Chinese American officer who really wanted to serve our community. While Officer Wenjian Liu was killed in the line of duty, Officer Liang was indicted because of an accidental shooting. I believe that his conviction was unjust and I do not believe that the charge of reckless manslaughter is supported by any reasonable view of the evidence submitted at trial. Likewise, the conviction of official misconduct is unsupported by the evidence.

I respectfully ask that your office would reconsider the position and will stipulate to Liang's Motion to Set Aside the illogical verdict handed down by the jury. If your office will not agree to set aside the verdict, I respectfully ask that you sentence Police Officer Peter Liang to probation. Institutional confinement of Police Officer Peter Liang is not necessary for the protection of the public. A prison sentence would be inconsistent with the ends of justice. It would send the wrong message to our Asian American community.

Respectfully submitted,
编辑读者评论
Chris L. 留言于2016-02-18 01:55:01
评论:UPDATE - From The Chinese American Professors and Professionals Network (2016 No.5)
Thank you Aimee!
编辑读者评论
Xiaofeng Yang 留言于2016-02-18 01:51:10
评论:UPDATE - From The Chinese American Professors and Professionals Network (2016 No.5)
姜主编及各位好,拜个晚年!
感谢你们的新闻报道,受益匪浅。
祝猴年大吉,事业亨通!

北美华人汽车工程师协会
www.nacsae.org
编辑读者评论
RCAO 留言于2016-02-18 01:11:48
评论:UPDATE - From The Chinese American Professors and Professionals Network (2016 No.5)
尊敬的美华联各社团侨领朋友们:
春节好!现转发2016年美国华人社团联合会换届选举委员会通知, 详细选举办法请参考附件。从现在到2月28日正式选举还有近两周时间, 请大家注意以下事项:
1. 请八位候选人务必在2/20/16前提交书面个人简历和政见,并发至邮箱chineseroundtable@yahoo.com。
2. 凡本人不能出席也无委托人,请尽快回复以下信息至邮箱 Rcao.yearbook@gmail.com,完成登记程序。您将收到正式选票, 请打印填表后寄到指定的美华联邮箱。
3. 所有社团都已有专人负责联络通知。如果因故未能通知到, 请转发本通知,确保每一个社团都能及时收到选举通知。有关本选举通知的任何问题, 请大家联系秘书处。

秘书处 rcao.yearbook@gmail.com
编辑读者评论
【首页】【前页】[201] [202] [203] [204] [205] [206] [207] [208] [209] [210] 【后页】【末页】
第  页  
共12652条留言,每页10条,当前第209/1266页
全部留言读者评论个人留言
您的名字:
电子邮件:
留言题目:
留言内容:
注意: 留言内容不要超过4000字,否则会被截断。
未 审 核:  是
  
CAPPN
CAPPN
我的百宝箱
博客公告
留言簿
论坛回复总汇
我的博友
我的博友日记列表
关于博主
博客名称:美国华裔教授专家网
用户名 :CAPPN
日记总数:
读者评论:12652
访问人次:
网站首页关于我们联系我们申请加入后台管理设为主页加入收藏
美国华裔教授专家网版权所有,谢绝拷贝。如欲选登或发表,请与美国华裔教授专家网联系。
Copyright © 2024 ScholarsUpdate.com. All Rights Reserved.