 |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
varlog  留言于2015-01-10 12:25:55 |
|
|
|
评论: 中国经济走向可持续平稳快速发展之路 - 从最大制造国走向最强制造 |
|
|
Why do Chinese political leaders have engineering degrees whereas their American counterparts have law degrees?
Having visited China often (when doing business), my understanding is that China has actually never been really communist. If one looks over a period of the last 2000 to 3000 years, the communist decades were a blip on the history line, more like a correction mechanism after the Imperial system had lost its grip and power. The underlying philosophy is that China has always been and still is a Confucian system, i.e. a technocracy. It might not be a democracy as in the West (where democracy often doesn't work because it has turned into system of greed) but they carefully replace the leaders every few years. They have a very long term planning, actually 60 years (12 plans of 5 years). These plans are not like the detailed Sovjet central planning but more like a business plan whereby the execution is left to a highly competitive free market. The Chinese are also very good organisers. Look at how quickly they built their high speed train network. I have seen cases whereby a 30 km highway was refurbished over a W/E. The same would have taken 1 or 2 years in Europe.
I think that in general, running a country should be more a management/engineering job than a political one. Laywers should only help to create an ethical/moral framework. Beware if they write laws that benefit political interest groups.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
varlog 留言于2015-01-10 12:00:54 |
|
|
|
评论: 北京大学工学院近讯 |
|
|
Happy new year! Hope you had a great holiday.
Thank you so much for your support and understanding. We have promoted the program several times via social media, and also send email to all in our mailing list. Until now, there are 1223 people viewed our Wechat promotion material. We will try our best to promote and let more students know. Thanks and Best Regards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
varlog 留言于2015-01-10 10:37:49 |
|
|
|
评论:《神州学人》编辑部欢迎您的见解：对“世界级”科研突破的标准及判断 |
|
|
China’s First National Critique: The 1954 Campaign to “Discuss the Draft Constitution”
Thursday, January 15, 2015
2:00 PM - 4:00 PM
Bunche Hall 10383
In 1954, as part of the “National Discussion of the Draft Constitution,” Chinese engaged in a surprisingly wide-ranging deliberation about political and social rights, the obligations of citizenship, state symbols, political institutions and ideology. Many asked frank, penetrating and frequently prescient questions about law, class, and political power, and offered provocative suggestions for revision. This talk will delve into the content of this constitutional discussion and examine its implications for the historiography of the PRC and the way we understand Chinese constitutionalism.
Neil J. Diamant is Professor of Asian Law and Society at Dickinson College and Chair of the East Asian Studies Department. He is author of Revolutionizing the Family: Politics, Love, and Divorce in Urban and Rural China, 1949-1968 (2000), Engaging the Law in China: State, Society and Possibilities for Justice (2005) and Embattled Glory: Veterans, Military Families and the Politics of Patriotism in China, 1949-2007 (2009). Before joining the Dickinson faculty in 2002, he taught at Tel Aviv University in Israel. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
martin 留言于2015-01-10 03:00:04 |
|
|
|
评论: 《即时通讯》周电—2014年第38期 |
|
|
Thank you very much. Have a nice week end. Looking forward to see you soon.
*´¨)
Thanks¸.·*´¨) ¸.·*¨)
(¸ .·´ (¸ .·´Regards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
martin 留言于2015-01-10 00:35:10 |
|
|
|
评论: UPDATE - From The Chinese American Professors and Professionals Network (2015 No.1) |
|
|
The following are my comments & suggestions:
I am not familiar with 国际信息系统协会. Will this organization be able to play actual roles?
What's the purpose of 全球创新应用技术孵化启动基金 ? Will it be used to assist adopting companies to start up businesses in Pudong or to award the innovators? I believe that it should be the former.
To start up the cooperation among 3-4 parties, it had better to be more specific in the proposal such as what Pudong needs to do, what Scholarnet will do etc.
Also, the third function--辐射全国的大宗贸易平台虚拟经济集群, seems not related with our proposed platform. Regards!
Bill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
博客名称：美国华裔教授专家网 |
|
用户名 ：CAPPN |
|
日记总数： |
|
读者评论：12657 |
|
访问人次： |
|
|
|
