 |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
BRUCE S.  留言于2018-02-21 16:40:34 |
|
|
|
评论：UPDATE - From The Chinese American Professors and Professionals Network (2018 No.4) |
|
|
年初三的一个段子比春晚强
Subject: 四大名著
四大名著，各执一端，各逞风采。
三国是正史，
水浒是野史，
红楼是家史，
西游是妖史。
（涤按： 无论何种历史都是故事传奇，否则没人感兴趣。）
三国写官，
水浒写盗，
红楼写人，
西游写怪 。
（涤按：官、盗、怪莫不是人。 ）
三国玩的是心计，
水浒玩的是义气，
红楼玩的是感情，
西游玩的是神奇 。
（涤按：无外乎常人的超常规表演。 ）
西游：猴哥救我；
红楼：妹妹救我；
水浒：哥哥救我；
三国：军师救我 。
（涤按：我、我、我！ ）
三国写了一次变革，
水浒写了一次冲动，
红楼写了一场恋爱，
西游写了一次旅游 。
（涤按：皆为意淫。 ）
三国写了一个大时代，
水浒写了一帮大英雄，
红楼写了一个大家族，
西游写了一伙大妖怪。
（涤按：大小由人，恨爱由己。 ）
三国斗智斗勇，
红楼怀金悼玉，
水浒官逼民反，
西游光怪陆离 。
（涤按：潜意识或明意识的追求。 ）
红楼：大部分是女人，
水浒：大部分是男人，
西游：大部分不是人
三国：大部分全是人。
（涤按：干脆点，全是人。 ）
红楼：丫头脸皮厚，
水浒：朝廷脸皮厚，
三国：军师脸皮厚
西游：神仙脸皮厚 。
（涤按：厚皮厚道不是一回事。 ）
红楼：亲戚靠不住，
西游：神仙靠不住，
三国：战友靠不住。
水浒：老大靠不住 。
（涤按：你自己就靠得住么？）
西游：酒要偷着来喝，
红楼：酒要美女陪喝，
水浒：酒要大碗来喝，
三国：酒要煮熟了喝 。
（涤按：新酒老酒瓶最关键，美酒劣酒喝最紧要。 ）
西游：俺们天上有人，
红楼：俺们朝廷有人，
水浒：俺们道上有人，
三国：俺们有的是人。
（涤按：哪怕网上也得有人。 ）
红楼：贾不贾，白玉为堂金做马，
西游：耍不耍，唐僧骑着大白马，
三国：打不打，五虎关张赵黄马，
水浒：傻不傻，好汉枉做朝庭马。
（涤按：Something or Nothing, that’s the question。 ）
西游：浪子回头，师父指引到西方实习，
红楼：孤女梦断豪门，哥哥为你泪撒红尘，
三国：从贫贱到富强，三兄弟的旷世畸恋。
水浒：何去何从，3个弱女，105个虎狼壮汉。
（涤按：西方人会想歪了，3个女人如何被105条汉子分享。 ）
西游：
出身不好，想成佛是有难度的，
红楼：
出身不好，想嫁人是有难度的，
水浒：
出身不好，想当官是有难度的，
三国：
出身不好，想创业是有难度的。
（涤按：死难生更难，不死不活倒是常态。 ）
三国侧重在国：
治国，兴国，安国，丧国。
水浒侧重在气：
勇气，义气，豪气，霸气。
红楼侧重在情：
亲情，爱情，官情，民情。
西游侧重在趣：
情趣，游趣，野趣，妖趣。
（涤按：三国结帮谋国，水浒丐帮痞气，红楼有情无义，无趣才最糟糕。 ）
以下补充：
三国：杀人，
水浒：坑人，
红楼：爱人，
西游：吃人。
（涤按：除了人还是人。 ）
三国：军阀打架，
水浒：好汉打架，
红楼：亲戚打架，
西游：神仙打架。
（涤按：不打架不得活。 ）
三国：学的是韬略，
水浒：学的是造反，
红楼：学的是叛逆，
西游：学的是皈依。
（涤按：学的是不做凡人。 ）
三国：先分后合，
水浒：先合后分，
红楼：有合有分，
西游：难合难分。
（涤按：分分合合纷纷。 ）
三国：为的是当皇帝，
水浒：为的是当大官，
红楼：为的是当情人，
西游：为的是当神仙。
（涤按：为的是当想象中人。 ）
三国：与人斗，其乐无穷，
水浒：与官斗，其乐无穷，
西游：与妖斗，其乐无穷，
红楼：窝里斗，其乐无穷。
（涤按：编造有趣的故事乐无穷。 ）
我的亲们，你们看懂了四大名著么？
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UCLA Center for Chinese Studies 留言于2018-02-21 07:12:20 |
|
|
|
评论：UPDATE - From The Chinese American Professors and Professionals Network (2018 No.4) |
|
|
The Inscribed Studio Photo as “I-Portrait”: Photographing a New Self in Early Twentieth-Century China
Wednesday, February 21, 2018
2:30 PM - 4:00 PM
Bunche Hall 10383
Talk by Wu Hung, University of Chicago
This talk studies photographs that subtly disrupt the classification of portraits and self-portraits. These are studio portraits that bear the sitters’ inscriptions. Using a group of images related to the “queue-cutting” movement in early 20th-century China as examples, Wu Hung suggests that when an inscription is imbued with a distinct “I” voice and expresses the sitter’s personal feeling, experience, and aspiration, it transforms the anonymous portrait into a “self-image.” This case study further leads us to contemplate on photography’s role in facilitating such transformation.
Wu Hung is Harrie A. Vanderstappen Distinguished Service Professor in Chinese Art History at the Departments of Art History and East Asian Languages and Civilizations, the University of Chicago. An elected member of American Academy of Arts and Sciences, he has published widely on both traditional and contemporary Chinese art. His recent publications include The Art of Yellow Springs: Understanding Chinese Tombs (2010), A Story of Ruins: Presence and Absence in Chinese Art and Visual Culture (2012), Contemporary Chinese Art: A History (2014), and Zooming In: Histories of Photography in China (2016).
UCLA Center for Chinese Studies
11381 Bunche Hall, Los Angeles, CA 90095
Campus Mail Code: 148703
Tel: (310) 825-8683
Fax: (310) 206-3555
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
California Community Colleges Technology Center 留言于2018-02-21 07:08:22 |
|
|
|
评论：UPDATE - From The Chinese American Professors and Professionals Network (2018 No.4) |
|
|
Dear Colleagues:
We are all aware of the many initiative/performance metrics at play in the California Community Colleges (CCC). Understanding, tracking, responding to, and reporting these various metrics have been difficult at best. In response to the metrics-related concerns expressed by our CCC colleagues, Chancellor Eloy Ortiz Oakley has initiated an effort to integrate, simplify and align these various metrics. The initiative, led by Visiting Vice Chancellor Omid Pourzanjani, will be conducted through a series of meetings with a representative advisory group to ensure that ample input from the colleges will guide the preparation and recommendation of a simplified set of metrics to the Chancellor’s Office.
The fundamental approach for this work is outlined below:
1. The focus will be strictly on students and their educational journeys from recruitment to completion, not on functional divisions, grants, funding sources, etc.
2. The outcome will be a simplified set of metrics drillable for details. This set of metrics will displace all other student-specific metrics (except for federal metrics such as Perkins).
3. Equity will not be viewed as a separate activity; instead it will be observed across all metrics. Therefore each metric will be drillable by gender, age, ethnicity, first-gen, SES, etc.
4. Metrics will be broken into three categories: access (input), practices (process), and student outcomes (output). Alignment with Guided Pathways and Completion by Design frameworks will also be considered.
5. Number of recommended metrics will be limited to ensure that we focus only on critical measures.
6. Each metric will be closely reviewed to ensure it is valid, viable, drillable, measurable, and critical.
7. An implementation/transition plan will be created for when each metric in the set can be put into production and which ones need legislative work. Extensive analysis and modeling of data will be performed before the presentation of the implementation/transition plan.
Schedule Of Activities
A tentative schedule for the activities is outlined below:
• February 26 at 10:00 a.m. – First statewide webinar
• March 12 – Second meeting with the statewide working group
• March 26 at 10:00 a.m. – Second statewide webinar
• April 23 – Final meeting with the statewide working group
• April 30 at 10:00 a.m. – Third statewide webinar
• April 30 – Final report delivered to the Chancellor’s Cabinet
A whitepaper will be prepared before each working group meeting to provide background on critical issues to the participants. It will include such information as an inventory of existing and legislated metrics, syntheses of national efforts to create statewide community college metrics, and guidelines for developing a set of recommended metrics. The first whitepaper has been published and shared publicly along with related information.
Webinar Participation Info
To attend any of the three statewide webinars, please use the following participant information. The same information is valid for all three webinar dates:
Meeting Title: Metric Simplification Initiative
Time: 10 a.m. - 11 a.m.
Join from PC, Mac, iOS or Android: http://cccconfer.org/GoToMeeting?SeriesID=508710b4-64ea-4985-8eb4-2f8ee0ce0bd4
Or join by phone: 1-913-312-3202*, Participant Passcode: 781826
California Community Colleges Chancellor''''s Office
1102 Q Street, Sacramento, CA 95811
949-233-2661 Cell
opourzanjani@cccco.edu |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
博客名称：美国华裔教授专家网 |
|
用户名 ：CAPPN |
|
日记总数： |
|
读者评论：12652 |
|
访问人次： |
|
|
|
