用户名:  密码:   
网站首页即时通讯活动公告最新消息科技前沿学人动向两岸三地人在海外历届活动关于我们联系我们申请加入
栏目导航 — 美国华裔教授专家网最新消息海外近报
关键字  范围   
 
坚守澳大利亚的珍贵宝石 - 一个全国性的医疗保健系统
作者:Richard Wong | 2010/3/25 13:53:05 | 浏览:3193 | 评论:1

          Health Care reform is in the news in Australia, the United States and elsewhere. The Rudd government has recently released its proposed overhaul plan for the Hospital and Health Care system in Australia over the coming years. The plan comes in the wake of a report previously commissioned by the government, Towards a Healthier Future for all Australians.

          At the same time the Obama adminstration in the U.S. has finally managed to get its Health Care Reform Bill through the Congress. The bill increases government health insurance subsidies so that some 30 million Americans , presently uninsured,  can get some cover, widens the government health plan to provide better care for poor people, expands taxes on the very rich to help fund the scheme, and outlaws  health insurance companies from refusing to provide insurance cover to those with known, pre-existing medical conditions. The reform will cost about $US94 billion a year. (The American Defence budget is around $US650 billion annually).

          The horrors of the American health care system have become quite well known internationally, especially with all the controversy over the Obama Health Care Reform Bill.   People live in fear of falling ill because they have incomplete cover or, in the case of the poor, no cover at all.  After one major operation, such as coronary surgery, bills of up to $US1 million can come in.

          For someone without health insurance there is really nowhere to go for medical help. Of personal bankcruptcies in the U.S. 62% are attributed to inability to pay hospital and medical bills. The United States is well down the life expectancy ranking in the OECD countries. It ranks 24th (life expectancy average of 79.4 years). Australia ranks 5th (life expectancy average of 81.2). The four at top ranking are Japan, Hong Kong,  Iceland and Switzerland.  This surely tells a story about the richest country in the world.

          The Australian Health Care story has been much more positive for what it has brought the people.  To a certain extent, the right to universal health care did start to emerge in the early twentieth century.  Publicly funded hospitals started to be built in the States, with access guaranteed to the public . After 1945, the ALP government, still in office from the war years, proposed a series of measures aimed at offering everyday people much better Health Care arrangements.  These measures included a free hospital system, funded from taxation revenue, compulsory health insurance, salaried doctors for poorer people in need of medical help, and the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS). Vested interests stirred up a storm (a little like in the recent U.S. events) and all of the proposals were blocked by failed referendums,  the medical profession's opposition or High Court rulings declaring them unconstitutional. The battle for universal health care had suffered a setback. But in 1951, the Coalition government (Liberals and Country Party), led by Robert Menzies, proposed a National Health Scheme which included a slightly adapted PBS, a voluntary medical and hospital benefits insurance scheme, a Pensioner Medical service and a more specified system of health grants to the States. The vested interests were generally accommodated by the Coalition government and the storm was largely quelled. Menzies' National Health Scheme brought many of the pieces together and marked a step forward in the winning of a universal health care right in Australia.

          In 1974  a new public health insurance agency – Medibank – was established by the Whitlam Labor government, followed in 1984 by Medicare funded from a taxation levy of 1.5%. Medicare was set up by the Hawke/Keating Labor government. Both health insurance agencies took important steps forward in strengthening the universal Health Care right. Public hospitals were open to all for treatment and 85% of doctors' scheduled fees could be reclaimed through Medicare. Those wanted to take out private insurance could do so and be largely covered for accommodation in private hospitals.

          Having a Medicare system and free public hospital access right are most important things for a country and people. For the old and sick, the mother, the child, the migrant, the injured they are vital.  They are a precious jewel that cannot be taken for granted.    Some of the old vested interests would pull Medicare apart if they had the chance.  They have tried and so far failed.

          Long waiting lists, scarce beds, exhausted medical staff and chaotic management in public hospitals today weaken the right of universal access to Health Care.  Those with a bit more money pay private health insurance and use the private system.   That is why the current debate in Australia and the planned action to “fix” the public hospital system are so important.

          We have come to know a bit more about the Health Care situation in the U.S. during the battle for the Reform Bill. We have something much better in Australia  and should aim to hold on tight, protecting and improving it wherever we can.

25th March 2010

相关栏目:『海外近报
日本公主又借上班出逃?继承了王位和美貌的顶级贵女们都什么样? 2024-04-26 [60]
女子自称“炼金术师”,在贫民窟创作艺术,作品讽刺又有趣 2024-04-24 [75]
布林肯国务卿关于《2023年各国人权报告》的讲话 2024-04-24 [113]
这个国家是真的走出来了! 2024-04-20 [183]
美国海关EAPA调查的应对策略——美国海关对逃避反倾销及反补贴税的执法力度大幅加强 2024-04-17 [144]
高盛:迎接亚洲货币贬值潮 2024-04-17 [163]
日本乡绅直面首相:记住你的俸禄来自何处 2024-04-17 [170]
美国家庭资产净值创新高 2024-04-13 [247]
美国众议院通过修订版《外国情报监视法》 2024-04-14 [168]
世界上最深的洞穴超2212米!最近一次合法探险,在1100米处发现了一具人类尸体 2024-04-10 [187]
相关栏目更多文章
最新图文:
:“为什么海外华人那么爱国,但是让他回国却不愿意?...“ :学术出版巨头Elsevier 彻查433名审稿人“强迫引用”黑幕 :中国336个国家重点实验室布局 :中澳政府联合出手打击洗钱和逃税漏税 大量中国居民海外账户遭冻结 :摄影师苏唐诗与寂寞百年的故宫对话6年,3万张照片美伦美奂 :大数据分析图解:2019中国企业500强 张梦然:英国惠康桑格研究所:人体内的微生物与出生方式有关 :美众议院将调查华裔部长赵小兰“利用职权为家族谋利“
更多最新图文
更多《即时通讯》>>
Richard Wong说:留言于2010-03-25 06:25:13(第1条)
Dear Professor Jiang,

I have slightly updated the article. The final version is attached.

Please use this final version if you decide to publish it in the Update.

Thank you.

Best regards,
Richard Wong
 
打印本文章
 
您的名字:
电子邮件:
留言内容:
注意: 留言内容不要超过4000字,否则会被截断。
未 审 核:  是
  
关于我们联系我们申请加入后台管理设为主页加入收藏
美国华裔教授专家网版权所有,谢绝拷贝。如欲选登或发表,请与美国华裔教授专家网联系。
Copyright © 2024 ScholarsUpdate.com. All Rights Reserved.