用户名:  密码:   
网站首页即时通讯活动公告最新消息科技前沿学人动向两岸三地人在海外历届活动关于我们联系我们申请加入
栏目导航 — 美国华裔教授专家网最新消息社区报道
关键字  范围   
 
加州SCA5法案不利亞裔 民众掀起反对浪潮(附:律师建议)
来源:世界新聞網 | 2014/2/24 15:20:18 | 浏览:4728 | 评论:2

请反对SCA5 法案的人士加紧打电话给议长。(916)319-2053.
See link:http://www.sca5.net/?p=376&from=singlemessage&isappinstalled=0

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

  加州參議會剛通過一項表面上恢復平權、骨子裡可能傷害華裔的提案。該提案限制亞裔在加州公立大學入學比例,使亞裔學生入學機會減少。有人批評提案將把美國從主張機會均等的國家,變成結果平等的社會主義國家,危害性將遠大於ABC電視台的辱華節目。加州亞裔社區對此已有強烈反應,網路上有人發動連署請願,反對這項立法;但加州三位華裔州參議員余胤良、劉雲平和劉璿卿都投下贊成票,令華裔社區一片譁然。

  加州民主黨西裔州議員賀南德茲等推動的 SCA5修憲公投案,如再獲眾議會通過,還須選民公投決定,該案目的是要增加西語裔進入大學名額,是西裔的「平權反攻」,雖前途未卜,但已重新點燃「平權法案」爭議。「平權法案」(或譯為平權措施,Affirmative Action)是1960年代美國民權運動的一部分,原始目的是為防止針對族裔、膚色、性別等方面的歧視,使少數族裔在就業、入學、政府合約等方面獲平等待遇,確保公立機關學校任職或就學的少數族裔,能適當反映總人口的比例。

  平權法案具體作法是以「族裔配額」(racial quotas)達成目標,所以形成長期最大爭議。族裔配額使機關、學校錄取新人時,除了申請人的成績與能力之外,也納入族裔背景考量。假設兩位申請人成績相同,少數族裔即優先獲錄取,形成所謂「反歧視」(reverse discrimination),與平權法案不分族裔均享有平等權利的理念背道而馳,所以引起連串法律訴訟。

  加州1996年因此通過 209號提案,「矯正」這種現象,隨後華盛頓州、密西根州、內布拉斯加州、亞利桑納州、康乃狄克州、新罕布夏州等跟進通過類似法案。結果證明,加州209 號提案的落實反而使亞裔學生憑藉實力,而非族裔或膚色,成為最大受益者。不考慮族裔背景下,加州大學(UC)系統亞裔2013年新生比率成長至36%,而加州亞裔人口僅占總人口13%。

  美國人口結構變化,或許平權法案與族裔配額都面臨重新檢討。1960年代平權法案要照顧的少數族裔,是飽受種族隔離與歧視之害的非裔,西裔與亞裔也連帶雨露均霑。但半個多世紀後,非裔、亞裔仍是名副其實的少數,但西裔在美國西南各州的人口大增,加州的西裔更將在2040年前後取代白人,成為多數。如今加州西裔民主黨州議員推動公投案,想恢復大學入學平權法案,以保障其多數, 豈非大開平等權利倒車,造成更多不平等與反歧視?

  平權法案也讓各族裔反思「真平等」的意義。加州取消禁止公立大學以種族與膚色決定錄取標準後,西裔與非裔入學人數雖減少,但畢業生人數卻大致相同,顯示輟學率大幅下降,其中非裔畢業率在20年間成長一倍,可見維持公平競爭的大學有其必要,事關學生前途和美國的總體學術競爭力,豈容因族裔和政治因素介入而扭曲。

  須釐清的是,加州1996年通過第209號提案,由共和黨人提出,具體內容是禁止加州政府以種族與性別作為決定就業、入學與政府合約的標準,並強調是源自1964年聯邦民權法案(Civil Rights Act)的立意精神。但當時民主黨人宣傳,該提案是為取消平權法案的惡法,不利少數族裔。在這種背景下,當時多數華裔民眾遂大力反對209號提案。

  1996 年底,近20位南加地區華裔民選議員出席在洛杉磯世界日報舉行的一場座談會,民主黨華裔議員侃侃而談,大力反對209號提案;共和黨華裔民選議員則尷尬地欲言又止,其中還有人見勢頭不妙,提早離場避免尷尬。很顯然,黨派立場左右了華裔民選議員態度,多數華裔選民當時也無法預料209號提案對華人的正面影響。事隔17年,西裔民主黨州議員推動恢復公立大學的平權法案,可能傷害華裔學生入學機會,華裔民主黨議員還是跟隨政黨立場投了贊成票,似乎未記取209 號提案的前車之鑑。

  華裔學生學業能力、用功程度有目共睹,自然不能被配額制復活受打壓。爭議已在網路延燒,民眾連署請願,希望打消法案,後續進展可能變全美熱門話題。我們呼籲全美華裔重視此事,並以和平理性態度與民選議員和其他族裔溝通,確保族裔整體權益不被侵犯,法案也不能再開倒車。

SCA-5惹怒加州中堅力量

加州SCA5法案不利亞裔 民众掀起反对浪潮(附:律师建议)

加州參議院以27票對9票的絕對多數通過了由拉丁裔參議員Ed Hernandez提出的加州憲法5號修正案(Senate Constitutional Amendment no. 5,或SCA-5),這個修正案推翻了《加州民權提案》(即209提案)中關於不允許加州公立大學在錄取學生時考慮種族、性別和族群因素的條文。如果這個修正案再在加州眾議院獲得通過,并且在11月大選中也得以通過,那麽亞裔(包括華裔、印度裔、日、韓、越南、菲律賓等東南亞裔)進入加州公立大學的機會將由現在的36%降為13%。這個明顯不利於亞裔的政策一出臺,立即引起了強烈的憤怒:加州發展的主力是亞裔,加州稅收的主要來源是亞裔,加州公立大學精英的重要來源是亞裔,為什麽在分配進入加州公立大學名額的時候卻要按人口比例來計算?

《美國平權法案》和《加州民權提案》

為了搞清楚SCA-5的來龍去脈,我們先大致介紹一下《美國平權法案》(Affirmative Action)。1965年,美國總統約翰遜簽署一項名為《美國平權法案》的行政命令,規定在大學錄取學生、公司招收或晉升僱員、政府招標時,應當杜絕對膚色、性別、信仰、族群的歧視,目的是對歷史上遭到歧視的非裔和女性給一些現實的利益,作為補償。這項命令實施之後,高校錄取制度成了熱點,有的大學明確地給非裔、拉美裔申請者加分,有的大學甚至矯枉過正,變成了非裔對白人的“逆向歧視”。

比較典型的案例是1978年的“巴克案”。巴克是一個白人男生,連續兩年被一個醫學院拒絕錄取,與此同時,這個醫學院根據16%非裔學生的定額製,錄取了一些比巴克各方面條件差的非裔學生。巴克一氣之下上訴到美國最高法院,最高法院裁定對非裔學生實行定額製是違憲的,但仍然在原則上支持“平權行動”。這件事在全國範圍引起了議論,甚至抗議。

1995年,加州州長Peter Wilson指出:“不能讓群體權利踐踏個人權利,我們應當鼓勵個人才幹。”1996年11月,加州以公投的方式通過了著名的《加州民權提案》(即209提案),該提案修改加州憲法,禁止州政府在公務員招聘、政府合同招標以及公立大學招生時考慮種族、性別和族群因素。1997年4月,這一公投結果得到了最高法院的認可,使加州成為全美第一個禁止公立大學以種族因素為錄取標準之一的州。取消“平權行動”的效果立竿見影,1998年伯克利大學非裔學生的錄取人數從1997年的562個下降到191個,拉美裔的學生也從1045個下降到434個。

SCA-5很有可能獲得通過

西裔背景的加州參議員Ed Hernandez提出SCA-5的理由是,加州209提案在大學錄取中取消種族因素的做法造成加州大學中少數族裔比例太低,任由亞裔佔據名校的多數名額對西裔和非裔學生不公平,必須立法規定公立大學在錄取新生時考慮種族背景,使各族裔得到平等的受教育機會。

加州法律規定,修正加州憲法可以通過兩種途徑,其中一種途徑是由加州參眾兩院中的任何一院提出,在兩院中都獲得2/3多數贊成後可以進入選民投票表決,超過50%贊成就可以修改憲法。目前的狀態是,SCA-5由參議員提出,并且已經獲得參議院2/3多數贊成(40名參議員,27票贊成,9票反對,4票棄權或缺席)。問題的嚴重性在於,參議院投票中,民主黨參議員全部投了贊成票,尤其是和亞裔有關的參議員也全部投了贊成票,更是令亞裔選民寒心。

下一步是將SCA-5送到眾議院表決。眾議院有80位議員,其中民主黨55票,共和黨25票。如果像參議院投票一樣,民主黨全部投贊成票,就已經夠2/3多數,可以順利地放到11月的公投選票上。公投的形勢更加嚴峻,近幾年來,大量西裔加入美國籍,他們人數眾多,投票積極,成為加州選民中一股不可忽視的力量。相對來說,亞裔人數少,投票率歷來不高,所以勝算非常小。如果SCA-5得以通過,那麽可以預料,他們下次會集中力量推翻209提案中剩下的兩項,恢復在州政府公務員招聘和政府合同招標中的平權法案,前景堪憂。

最後一搏

形勢如此嚴峻,時間如此緊迫,為了使我們的後代繼續維持一片自由發展的天空,所有的有識之士都要立即行動起來,背水一戰,最後一搏。我們中國人歷來喜歡窩裏鬥,頻頻遭到外人恥笑。難道我們就不能爭氣一回,實實在在地團結一回,讓外人對我們刮目相看一回?美亞團結促進會(UAAFA)和許許多多的民間組織已經行動起來,我們要廣為宣傳,讓更多的人知道事情的嚴重性和緊迫性,大家一致行動,盡快行動。從目前形勢來看,我們至少可以做以下兩件事:

1. 給所在選區的眾議員(尤其是亞裔眾議員)寫信,要求他們對SCA-5投反對票。下面網站可以找到代表你的州眾議員http://findyourrep.legislature.ca.gov / 打開議員網頁後,按Contact按鈕就可以寫Email了。寫信的時候要注意一個事實,就是華裔議員覺得華人投票率極低,而且捐款甚微,他們的票倉主要是非裔和拉丁裔,所以經常在投票時違心地投票,討好這些族裔,所以我們要對他們曉之以理,動之以情,希望他們回心轉意;也可以花一點時間和力氣組織自己選區內民眾聯署,在強大的民意壓力下,迫使議員考慮慎重投票。

2. 把著眼點放在11月的公投上,從現在開始紮紮實實地做宣傳組織工作,讓更多的亞裔家庭了解這個議案會對我們的孩子帶來什麽樣的負面影響,讓每一個選民都去投票。在宣傳的時候要注意兩點:一是千萬不要忽略了白人,因為他們也是SCA-5的受害者;二是千萬不要造成和西裔的對立,他們要求增加入學比例是合理的要求,但是SCA-5造成了更大的不合理。 (湯毅堅)

   反对SCA5:不要浪费时间, 要这样做才有帮助!

See link:

http://mp.weixin.qq.com/s?__biz=MzA5NDEwOTIyMA==&mid=200088418&idx=3&sn=d7500db15c585d7e996bfbfebca59df8&scene=1#rd

Here is the article again in case you cannot open the link above:

2014-02-25 Civil Rights

加州SCA5法案不利亞裔 民众掀起反对浪潮(附:律师建议)

从我做起, 从现在做起! 我们还来得及反对SCA5. 目前, 加州众议院的80席中, 55席民主党, 25席共和党. 对这个法案SCA5的支持是党派分票, 所以我们只需要保证 2个以上民主党议员勇敢地站出来, 投票反对, 我们就可以让法案胎死腹中. 现在我们可以做的是写信给代表我们选区的加州众议员, 去他们的网站给他们写.

Step 1:
下面网站里选Act Now有两个请愿投票, 有时间先去投票, 这样才能壮大声势.
http://www.saynosca5.com/

Step 2:http://findyourrep.legislature.ca.gov/
住在加州的朋友先寻找自己选区的州众议员

Step 3:

可能被影响的民主党州众议员列表, 这一份名单有被精心筛选过, 确定是机率比较高, 不会让大家浪费子弹, 集中火力攻击, 先写好篇文章, 这篇下面有很多范例, 不想写直接找一篇贴上发给对方也没关系, 最重要是让对方了解有这么多人重视这个问题, 内容其实不重要, 简单表达意思就够, 但最好是自己能添加一些自己的意见, 能够写一篇自己的文章是最好, 反正能够发那么多遍, 多花点时间在这里也是值得. 然后将这封信用Email再加上FacebookMessage发给下面列表所有的人, 我自己试过发一遍, 全部发完应该不会超过15分钟.

其中中间这种https://lcmspubcontact.lc.ca.gov/地址的要发比较特别, 一定必须要是填该选区地址, 才能写电子邮件给他们, 不然不会让你发, 所以如果不是自己选区或是有可用地址的就不用了.

另外除了最简单的发电子邮件外, 也可以打电话, Fax传真, 登门拜访都可以视情况运用联络.

Wesley Chesbro(North Coast)
710 E Street, Suite 150, Eureka, CA 95501
Tel:(707)445-7014  Fax:(707)445-6607
Email:assemblymember.chesbro@assembly.ca.gov
https://lcmspubcontact.lc.ca.gov/PublicLCMS/ContactPopup.php?district=AD02

Richard Pan(Sacramento)
2251 Florin Road, Suite 156, Sacramento CA 95822
Phone:(916)-262-0999  Fax:(916)262-0995
Email:assemblymember.pan@assembly.ca.gov
https://lcmspubcontact.lc.ca.gov/PublicLCMS/ContactPopup.php?district=AD09
http://www.drrichardpan.com/contact
https://www.facebook.com/RichardPanMD

Ken Cooley(Sacramento)
2729 Prospect Park Drive, Suite 130, Rancho Cordova, CA 95670
Tel:(916)464-1910  Fax:(916)464-1915
Email:assemblymember.cooley@assembly.ca.gov  &  ken@kencooley.com
https://lcmspubcontact.lc.ca.gov/PublicLCMS/ContactPopup.php?district=AD08
http://www.kencooley.com/contact
https://www.facebook.com/ken.cooley

Mariko Yamada(Southern Sacramento Valley, Wine Country, & North Bay)
725 Main Street Suite 206, Woodland, CA 95695
Tel:(530)662-7867  Fax:(530)662-6370
Email:assemblymember.yamada@assembly.ca.gov
https://lcmspubcontact.lc.ca.gov/PublicLCMS/ContactPopup.php?district=AD04
http://www.marikoyamada.net/contact
https://www.facebook.com/assemblymember.yamada

Marc Levine(North Bay)
3501 Civic Center Drive, Room 412, San Rafael, CA 94903
Tel:(415)479-4920  Fax:(415)479-2123
Email:assemblymember.levine@assembly.ca.gov  &  levineforassembly@gmail.com
https://lcmspubcontact.lc.ca.gov/PublicLCMS/ContactPopup.php?district=AD10
https://www.facebook.com/joinmarc

Rob Bonta(Central East Bay of the Bay Area)
1515 Clay Street, Ste. 2204, Oakland, CA 94612
Phone:(510)286-1670  Fax:(510)286-1888
Email:assemblymember.bonta@assembly.ca.gov
https://lcmspubcontact.lc.ca.gov/PublicLCMS/ContactPopup.php?district=AD18
http://www.robbonta.com/contact/
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Assemblymember-Rob-Bonta/160502927367568

Joan Buchanan(East Bay)
2694 Bishop Dr., Ste. 275, San Ramon, CA 94583
Tel:(925)328-1515  Fax:(925)328-1514
Email:assemblymember.buchanan@assembly.ca.gov
https://lcmspubcontact.lc.ca.gov/PublicLCMS/ContactPopup.php?district=AD16
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Assemblymember-Joan-Buchanan/220573791429818

Tom Ammiano(San Francisco)
455 Golden Gate Avenue, Suite 14300, San Francisco, CA 94102
Phone(415)557-3013  Fax(415)557-3015
Email:assemblymember.ammiano@assembly.ca.gov  & tom.ammiano@asm.ca.gov
https://lcmspubcontact.lc.ca.gov/PublicLCMS/ContactPopup.php?district=AD17
https://www.facebook.com/AssemblymemberTomAmmiano

Phil Ting(
丁右立)(San Francisco & San Mateo County)
455 Golden Gate Avenue, Suite 14600, San Francisco, CA 94102
Tel:(415)557-2312  Fax:(415)557-1178
Email:assemblymember.ting@assembly.ca.gov  &  phil@philting.com
       info@philting.com
https://lcmspubcontact.lc.ca.gov/PublicLCMS/ContactPopup.php?district=AD19
https://www.facebook.com/philtingsf

Kevin Mullin(San Francisco Peninsula)
1528 South El Camino Real, Suite 302, San Mateo, CA 94402
Tel:(650)349-2200  Fax:(650)341-4676
Email:assemblymember.mullin@assembly.ca.gov  &   kevin@kevinmullin.com
       info@kevinmullin.com
https://lcmspubcontact.lc.ca.gov/PublicLCMS/ContactPopup.php?district=AD22
https://www.facebook.com/AssemblymemberKevinMullin

Rich Gordon(San Francisco Peninsula suburbia into Silicon Valley)
5050 El Camino Real, Suite 117, Los Altos, CA 94022
Tel:(650)691-2121  Fax:(650)691-2120
Email:assemblymember.gordon@assembly.ca.gov
https://lcmspubcontact.lc.ca.gov/PublicLCMS/ContactPopup.php?district=AD24
https://www.facebook.com/RichGordon24

Paul Fong(
方文忠)(Silicon Valley)
2105 South Bascom Avenue, Suite 160, Campbell, CA 95008
Tel:(408)371-2802  Fax:(408)371-2809
Email:assemblymember.fong@assembly.ca.gov  &  paul@paulfong.org
https://lcmspubcontact.lc.ca.gov/PublicLCMS/ContactPopup.php?district=AD28
http://www.paulfongforcouncil.com/#!contact/c1zdo
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Paul-Fong/12907543117

Bob Wieckowski(East Bay and Silicon Valley)
39510 Paseo Padre Parkway, Suite 280, Fremont, CA 94538
Tel:(510)440-9030  Fax:(510)440-9035
Email:assemblymember.wieckowski@assembly.ca.gov
https://lcmspubcontact.lc.ca.gov/PublicLCMS/ContactPopup.php?district=AD25
https://www.facebook.com/bobwieckowski
https://www.facebook.com/Wieckowski4Senate

Mark Stone(Monterey Bay)
701 Ocean Street, 318-B, Santa Cruz, CA 95060
Tel:(831)425-1503  Fax:(831)425-2570
Email:assemblymember.stone@assembly.ca.gov  &  info@friendsofmarkstone.org
https://lcmspubcontact.lc.ca.gov/PublicLCMS/ContactPopup.php?district=AD29
http://friendsofmarkstone.org/contact
https://www.facebook.com/AssemblymemberMarkStone

Das Williams(Santa Barbara and Ventura)
101 W. Anapamu Street, Suite A, Santa Barbara, CA 93101
Tel:(805)564-1649  Fax:(805)564-1651
Email:assemblymember.Williams@assembly.ca.gov  &  das.williams2014@gmail.com
       das.williams2012@gmail.com
https://lcmspubcontact.lc.ca.gov/PublicLCMS/ContactPopup.php?district=AD37
https://www.facebook.com/DasWilliamsPage

Ed Chau(
周本立)(San Gabriel Valley)
1255 Corporate Center Dr. Ste 306, Monterey Park, CA 91754
Tel:(323)264-4949  Fax:(323)264-4916
Tel:(626)403-3033  Fax:(626)403-3022
Email:assemblymember.chau@assembly.ca.gov  &  edchau4assembly@gmail.com
https://lcmspubcontact.lc.ca.gov/PublicLCMS/ContactPopup.php?district=AD49
https://www.facebook.com/edwin.chau.98

Mike Gatto(Eastern end of the San Fernando Valley)
300 East Magnolia Boulevard, Suite 504, Burbank, CA 91502
Tel:(818)558-3043  Fax:(818)558-3042
Email:assemblymember.gatto@assembly.ca.gov  &  mg@mikegatto.com
https://lcmspubcontact.lc.ca.gov/PublicLCMS/ContactPopup.php?district=AD43
http://mikegatto.com/volunteers/
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Assemblyman-Mike-Gatto/248355458520271

Al Muratsuchi(South Bay, Beach Cities and the Palos Verdes Peninsula)
3460 Torrance Blvd., Suite 306, Torrance, CA 90503
Tel:(310)316-2164  Fax:(310)316-2480
Email:assemblymember.muratsuchi@assembly.ca.gov  &  info@alforassembly.com
       melissa@alforassembly.com
https://lcmspubcontact.lc.ca.gov/PublicLCMS/ContactPopup.php?district=AD66
https://www.facebook.com/almuratsuchi

Richard Bloom(West Los Angeles)
2800 28th Street, Suite 150, Santa Monica, CA 90405
Tel:(310)450-0041  Fax:(310)450-6090
Email:assemblymember.bloom@assembly.ca.gov  &  richard@richardbloom.com
https://lcmspubcontact.lc.ca.gov/PublicLCMS/ContactPopup.php?district=AD50
http://www.richardbloom.com/contact
https://www.facebook.com/RichardBloomCampaign

Toni Atkins(San Deigo)
1350 Front St., Room 6054, San Diego, CA 92101
Tel:(619)645-3090  Fax:(619)645-3094
Email:assemblymember.atkins@assembly.ca.gov  &  toniatkinsforassembly2012@gmail.com
https://lcmspubcontact.lc.ca.gov/PublicLCMS/ContactPopup.php?district=AD78
https://www.facebook.com/SDToni
https://www.facebook.com/toni.atkins.52

下面是请愿文章的范例, 发文章时称呼对方用First Name就可以, 写自己的名字的时候最好是First Name+Last Name, 这样看起来比较正式有力.

Dear XXX,

I hereby urge you to vote NO to SCA-5! As SCA-5 will roll back the clock to the days when students were discriminated against based on their race. SCA-5 hide under the disguise of equal opportunity. However SCA-5 is in fact the antithesis of equal opportunity as it demands equal outcomes. But true equity demands fair outcomes for all. The injustice of disparities in any population is when equity is diminished. It is communism in essence since resources are to be divided equally. It will destroy the incentive to excel and compete and  drag down U.S. competitiveness in the long run.

Lawmakers need to work on bills which applies to everyone regardless of their race for improvements in the quality of education for poor communities or for closing the gap where students have underachieved. What messages are we sending to our children that they should be treated differently because of their race, instead of their efforts and qualifications?

Therefore I strongly urge you to fight against SCA-5.  I have a dream, do you? Everyone in our community will pay close attention to this matter.

Thank you,
XXX

Dear XXX:

Please vote "NO" on SCA-5. This bill is to include race as a factor to provide preference in college admissions. I firmly believe that this is against the fundamental principles of U.S. law and the American legal system. All men are equal regardless of race.

Therefore, I strongly urge you to vote NO on this matter. Your vote is very important to everyone in our community.

Thank you,
XXX

Dear XXX,

Please vote "NO" on SCA-5. SCA-5 proposed using race as a factor in college admissions. I urge you to fight against SCA-5. Just as Martin Luther King, Jr. said 41 years ago, no children should be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character. Your child(ren)deserve this dream. Every American child deserves this dream. Don't you agree? It is about right or wrong. This is where the difference comes between a politician and a statesman/woman.

It's your choice which side you're on. I have a dream, do you? The people who shares the same dream as Martin Luther King, Jr. will remember your choice. They will decide who they vote for, who they send money to, and who they canvass for.

Best regards,
XXX

Dear XXX,

Please vote "NO" on SCA-5. It is pure racism! My kids future is as important as anyone's kids. Why two individuals at the same level of education might differ in their college admissions? What century do we live in? This is supposedly a country that believes in equality.

I strongly urge you to fight against SCA-5. Otherwise, no more votes and donations from me and all my relatives and friends for you or any Democrats. Everyone in our community will pay close attention to this issue.

Respectfully,
XXX

Dear XXX,

Please vote "NO" on SCA-5. Objection to any law that allow any discrimination against, or granting preferential treatment to, any individual or group on the basis of race in the operation of public education. Racial discrimination is wrong, whichever way it goes, in whatever name. If diversity is the point of preferences, why only in college admissions? Why not in the recruitment process of government agencies? in entertainment, in sports...

I strongly urge you to fight against SCA-5. All men are equal regardless of race. Otherwise, no more votes and donations from me and all my relatives and friends for you or any Democrats. Everyone in our community will pay close attention to this issue.

Best regards,
XXX

Dear XXX,

Please vote "NO" on SCA-5. I am impressed that this clear violation of constitutional law could even pass the senate! What are senators doing? How do we explain to our children that what they've been taught on equal opportunity is no longer true. It has been amended. Martin Luther King, Jr. said I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character. But it is no longer in accord with reality. Why don't we amend the employment standards after college admissions? So those who are entitled to privileges in admission could automatically get government jobs?

I strongly urge you to fight against SCA-5. All men are equal regardless of race. Otherwise, no more votes and donations from me and all my relatives and friends for you or any Democrats. Everyone in our community will pay close attention to this issue.

Respectfully,
XXX

Dear XXX,

Please vote "NO" on SCA-5. This bill is total racism. What a degradation! It's a waste of public money for those senators working on this nonsense. The rational behind the bill is totally ridiculous. We believe in the right of education for all Californians. California should not enrolled students based on race rather than qualifications.

I strongly urge you to fight against SCA-5. Otherwise, no more votes and donations from me and all my relatives and friends for you or any Democrats. Everyone in our community will pay close attention to this issue.

Respectfully,
XXX

Dear XXX,

Please vote "NO" on SCA-5. "I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character."---Martin Luther King, Jr. Do we helping Martin Luther King's dream(which is my dream too)? Do we punish hard working students by racial preferences? Is this the right way to promote better education for California?

I strongly urge you to fight against SCA-5. Otherwise, no more votes and donations from me and all my relatives and friends for you or any Democrats. Everyone in our community will pay close attention to this issue.

Respectfully,
XXX

Dear XXX,

Please vote "NO" on SCA-5. The only barrier for student of any colors for higher education is their work enthusiasm. How about we do the same thing for the State Assembly? Candidate must collect certain amount of votes(scores in S.A.T.)to be qualified, then by using qualified candidates’ race and ethnic background to decide if he/she can become a member of the California State Assembly. Because "We need to ensure that the State Assembly reflects our changing population".

I strongly urge you to fight against SCA-5. Students should be admitted based on merits, not race! Otherwise, no more votes and donations from me and all my relatives and friends for you or any Democrats. Everyone in our community will pay close attention to this issue.

Respectfully,
XXX

Dear XXX,

Please vote NO on SCA 5 as it is a racist bill. It promotes discrimination by judging people based on their race. Admission to any school among other things, should solely based on their own merit and not on their color, race, and etc. I believe preferential treatment based on race in college admission is not the right practice. In addition it violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. 

I strongly urge you to vote "No" on SCA 5. Students deserve have an equal opportunity in the college admission process regardless of their race. Thank you for listening to the voice of your people.

Respectfully,
XXX

Dear XXX,

Please vote "NO" on SCA-5. This is ridiculous and is so wrong! This is a reverse discrimination. This proposition limits the opportunity of certain kids to attend the University of California because of their races. Higher education should be offered to those who can do it.

I strongly urge you to fight against SCA-5. Students deserve have an equal opportunity in the college admission process regardless of their race. Otherwise, no more votes and donations from me and all my relatives and friends for you or any Democrats. Everyone in our community will pay close attention to this issue.

Best regards,
XXX

最后可以再加上下面这个

For more information on this topic, please refer to the article and video below.

The Painful Truth About Affirmative Action
http://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2012/10/the-painful-truth-about-affirmative-action/263122/

Elder vs. State Senator Ed Hernandez(D-CA)on Racial Preferences, Jan. 31, 2014
http://vimeo.com/86149155

如果要加The Painful Truth About Affirmative Action这个连结要再修整一下, 如果在讨论区用copy & paste有可能贴成不完整连结, 请注意一下这一点. 最好确认一下是完整的网址, 这个连结缩短是http://tinyurl.com/9jrnul4

这里有些反SCA-5的海报, 也可以考虑加在电子邮件中或传真都可以运用.
http://nosca5.blogspot.com/2014/02/sca-5.html

本文的网路版本在这里http://nosca5.blogspot.com/2014/02/sca5.html (saiholmes)

SCA5  专题汇总:

http://www.weidb.com/o1014.html

----------------------------------------

CivilRights

一个属于海内外华人的微信订阅平台,

从一开始它便致力于为我们华人发声!

欢迎广大朋友踊跃投稿,

希望更多的学生组织华人社团加盟!

每一位朋友出一份力,

我们的声音才有力!

投稿请发信至:OurCivilRights@gmail.com

请记得至少附上一张图片。

Articles in other languages are welcome. Please send your articles to the email address provided. Make sure that at least one picture is attached.

阅读原文

Gang Chen, Architect, LEED AP BD+C, Real Estate Broker(DRE# 01232392)

Publisher/Bestselling AuthorGreenExamEducation.com
Singer/Songwriter(
Music.ArchiteG.com

 

相关文章:『SCA5
『社区报道』 UCLA法律教授教授将揭露更多洛加大歧视亚裔的证据 2014-03-29 [1659]
『社区报道』 加州墨裔、非裔立法委员会发声明支持SCA5 2014-03-26 [1327]
『社区报道』 限制亞裔入學的SCA5提案遭封殺 社區不應高興太早 硬戰還在後頭 2014-03-18 [1488]
『内外互动』 反SCA5 華、韓、越裔齊怒吼 2014-03-10 [1574]
『内外互动』 加州參議會共和黨主席夏樂柏批SCA5提案發起者賀南德茲數據誤導 2014-03-05 [1210]
『社区报道』 在对SCA5说“不”声中 提升亚裔影响力 - 冲击波引发全美强烈反响 2014-02-27 [2219]
『社区动态』 反对SCA5歧视亚裔:不要浪费时间, 要这样做才有帮助! 2014-02-27 [6810]
『社区动态』 在美华人反对SCA5限制亚裔入学法案 号召对抗不公平待遇 2014-02-21 [3107]
更多相关文章
相关栏目:『社区报道
加州要奔“共同富裕”:“財富再分配“呼聲迭起 2021-12-04 [93]
2022年全美录取率最低的10所大学 2021-11-30 [355]
比尔·盖茨基金会:关于新冠病毒变异株,你需要知道的五件事 2021-11-29 [147]
辉瑞起诉资深华人员工,跳槽前窃取大量疫苗资料 2021-11-24 [164]
加州國會少一席的背後學問 2021-11-27 [131]
美国多地商店频遭洗劫,竟是犯罪团伙花500美元雇人干的…… 2021-11-27 [234]
UCLA丛京生教授荣获2022「IEEE 罗伯特·诺伊斯奖」 2021-11-24 [156]
亚裔不在少数族裔之列 美国大学新生分类引争议 2021-11-19 [172]
勒索軟體竟敢勒到太歲脖子 2021-11-14 [207]
《自然》:227篇论文被撤,700多篇待查!警惕学术专刊“新骗局” 2021-11-07 [226]
相关栏目更多文章
最新图文:
:陈文玲: 必须推动中美关系回到正确轨道 Colleen Flaherty 翻译 刘勤:MIT教授发文《美国经济评论》 :生命科学受益于明星科学家们的死亡 :北京和上海金融人的最新鄙视链 :日本政府《氢能利用进度表》 :美国《2016-2045年新兴科技趋势报告》 :天津工业大学“经纬英才”引进计划 :浙江财经大学国际青年学者论坛的邀请函 (10/31-11/1) :美国加大审查范围 北大多名美国留学生遭联邦调查局质询
更多最新图文
更多《即时通讯》>>
 
打印本文章
 
您的名字:
电子邮件:
留言内容:
注意: 留言内容不要超过4000字,否则会被截断。
未 审 核:  是
  
关于我们联系我们申请加入后台管理设为主页加入收藏
美国华裔教授专家网版权所有,谢绝拷贝。如欲选登或发表,请与美国华裔教授专家网联系。
Copyright © 2021 ScholarsUpdate.com. All Rights Reserved.