用户名:  密码:   
网站首页即时通讯活动公告最新消息科技前沿学人动向两岸三地人在海外历届活动关于我们联系我们申请加入
栏目导航 — 美国华裔教授专家网科技动向科技前沿
关键字  范围   
 
Alan Pan: Artificial Intelligence & the Future of Humans, Pew Research Center
Alan Pan: Artificial Intelligence & the Future of Humans, Pew Research Center
2018/12/18 3:57:05 | 浏览:1527 | 评论:0

http://www.pewinternet.org/2018/12/10/artificial-intelligence-and-the-future-of-humans/

Alan Pan: Artificial Intelligence & the Future of Humans, Pew Research Center

“Experts say the rise of artificial intelligence will make most people better off over the next decade, but many have concerns about how advances in AI will affect what it means to be human, to be productive and to exercise free will”

Artificial intelligence(AI)’s role in human society is more clear today than it was one to three generations ago, hallmarked by the pop-culture of B-studio science fiction movies discoverable during weekend Blockbuster store deals.  If the previous statement did not make sense, perhaps “big corpa” succeeded with their mechanical efforts to dumb down our American consumers and markets because “ignorant shoppers are profitable shoppers.”  Common themes such as “big corpa” blended utopia and dystopia together ranging from questionable happiness of human beings when treated as farm livestock, where men fight to be the best and women have sex for the strongest men’s sperm, to boredom survival in societies where everything is perfect so no human being has any complaint, where boredom ultimately leads to humanity’s own self-destruction.  Backtracking to the 1900s when machines were not as central compared to the 1950s, science fiction horror then was more philosophical and questioned the essence of humanity to create moral compasses and to better draw a line from horrors of war from science.  A hundred years from now, would we regret what we have done or not done now?  Between a genius defined by self and a genius defined by others, who is more of a genius?  Should financiers bear the same guilt as criminals as the lives they ruin?  These questions defined the moral compass and decisions of many scientists, inventors, and researchers through the World Wars, Cold War, and, albeit significantly fewer, even now.
Today, too many decision makers guiding the future of our human race grossly lack our moral compasses and utopia-dystopia perspectives we share since the past century.  Purposeful, we can transform research and development as cogs in our war machines.  And thoughtful, we can filter in and share innovation at the struggles and despairs of those not willing to fuel our war machines.  This is not entirely a dystopia because average, common people are able to choose between intellectual paragon and social popularity.  What about people with debilitating disabilities and histories?  If we learned anything about human nature from the modern convenience of our Internet, it is that technology continues to surprise new, unintended knowledge.  Wolf or hyena-type community packs that hound misfortunate people in communities have reach to hound misfortunate people anywhere in our world.  For business-operated platform hosts, these packs provide lucrative advertising, click, and data revenues and every scandal or incident further fuels such business.  As a businessperson, it is to such company’s best interests to help guide these packs to cause a viral incident that will generate more money for the company.  In research and development, these technologies are in the hands of such businesspeople who tend to cease and desist after receiving a court order, and then find the next money-making opportunity.  With more and more money in these peoples’ hands, we face increasing uncertainty in the preservation of humanity’s moral compasses and future-sightedness.
Writing as a 29 year old American male struggling to find a home and seeking to establish a big family, I commonly consider what directions our human race will face in thirty years.  As we work with more and more military partnerships due to the technological insufficiency of our federal, state, and local governments and civic inappropriateness of corporation and business security and defense functions(clearly evident from US defense spending increases from $300 million in 2000 to $717 billion in 2019), I can’t help but wonder our nation returning to our militaristic estates of the 1700s.  As much as non-Americans would like to believe in incompetence, I feel chills every time I envision the possibilities of how and whether our nation will secure the Americas to complete engineers’ wet-dreams of two super-continental American fortresses.  Alternatively, perhaps our military has already been taken over by artificially intelligent machines and we are simply following a GDP model.  I do not know.  Whether or not and under what conditions it would be worthwhile to have children in a dystopia also gravely concerns me.
At least the Pew Research Center summarizes some suggested solutions to AI and the future of America that I re-emphasize here. 
(1) “Global good is No. 1:Improve human collaboration across borders and stakeholder groups. Digital cooperation to serve humanity's best interests is the top priority. Ways must be found for people around the world to come to common understandings and agreements - to join forces to facilitate the innovation of widely accepted approaches aimed at tackling wicked problems and maintaining control over complex human-digital networks.”

(2) “Value-based system:Develop policies to assure AI will be directed at ‘humanness’ and common good. Adopt a 'moonshot mentality' to build inclusive, decentralized intelligent digital networks 'imbued with empathy' that help humans aggressively ensure that technology meets social and ethical responsibilities. Some new level of regulatory and certification process will be necessary.”

(3) “Prioritize people:Alter economic and political systems to better help humans ‘race with the robots.’ Reorganize economic and political systems toward the goal of expanding humans' capacities and capabilities in order to heighten human/AI collaboration and staunch trends that would compromise human relevance in the face of programmed intelligence.”

Maybe the majority of millennial parents are not wrong in “helicoptering” their children into their careers to the extent of our nation neglecting our at-risk youth, broken families, and orphans and treating us like trash and losers blaming how we didn’t study hard enough to graduate from a good school.  According to some opinions, maybe it is about politics and, after twenty years, it will finally be the most vulnerable of our American nation’s turn to receive assistance to establish a living for ourselves.  But what we clearly can observe today are the models for our AI frameworks and algorithms in the future.
We need some way to influence decision makers to develop their own moral compasses, or find some way to usurp their utopias on our dystopia.

相关栏目:『科技前沿
信息的传播速度能超过光速吗? 2024-02-29 [19]
体验R和python的不同绘制风格 2024-02-29 [27]
木头姐《Big Ideas 2024》报告来了,押注技术革命,未来7年股价复合增速超40%! 2024-02-28 [41]
美国癌症死亡率惊人下降,2030年抗癌策略值得学习! 2024-02-28 [557]
Sora·创世纪·大统一模型 2024-02-28 [45]
iPhone生态迎巨变 全新7大新功能要来 2024-02-26 [62]
解读OpenAI Sora文生视频技术原理 2024-02-20 [195]
构筑未来:框架化学的研究前沿与产业化展望 2024-02-19 [152]
一文读不懂Sora:注意力机制的再一次胜利 2024-02-19 [235]
Tqtm —— 一个拒绝无聊的 Python 库 2024-02-19 [164]
相关栏目更多文章
最新图文:
:美国《2016-2045年新兴科技趋势报告》 :天津工业大学“经纬英才”引进计划 :浙江财经大学国际青年学者论坛的邀请函 (10/31-11/1) :美国加大审查范围 北大多名美国留学生遭联邦调查局质询 :天安门广场喜迎“十一”花团锦簇的美丽景象 马亮:做院长就能够发更多论文?论文发表是不是一场“权力的游戏”? :印裔人才在美碾压华裔:我们可以从印度教育中学到什么? :北京452万人将从北京迁至雄安(附部分央企名单)
更多最新图文
更多《即时通讯》>>
 
打印本文章
 
您的名字:
电子邮件:
留言内容:
注意: 留言内容不要超过4000字,否则会被截断。
未 审 核:  是
  
关于我们联系我们申请加入后台管理设为主页加入收藏
美国华裔教授专家网版权所有,谢绝拷贝。如欲选登或发表,请与美国华裔教授专家网联系。
Copyright © 2024 ScholarsUpdate.com. All Rights Reserved.