用户名:  密码:   
网站首页即时通讯活动公告最新消息科技前沿学人动向两岸三地人在海外历届活动关于我们联系我们申请加入
栏目导航 — 美国华裔教授专家网两岸三地百家论坛
关键字  范围   
 
讀者投稿:No Confucius! No China!
作者:Richard Low | 2013/9/9 4:15:37 | 浏览:2660 | 评论:3
No Confucius? No China?
Reading online Chinese newspapers and commentaries everyday in my boring lonely retirement home, I came across a very enlightening article entitled,“Are We Able to Recover the Culture We Have Lost?”discussing how to recover the Chinese culture thrown away by Mao during his Cultural Revolution and use it to rebuild China. It was written by Professor Zhang Yiwu for the online“M4.cn.” The remarks quoted below from his paper somehow inspired me to make a comparison of the Chinese Empire as represented by the Han Dynasty(206 BCE - 220 CE)with the Roman Empire(27 BCE - 476 CE):
“哪些传统是可以适应现代社会的,是对我们有用的,哪些又是无用的?这需要拣选,找到可用的,适应我们现代生活的价值和习俗,中断的可以找回来,仍旧延续的可以发扬光大."
It may be noted that while the Chinese Empire was kept alive and active by succeeding dynasties for more than 2,000 years until the overthrow in 1911 of the Qing Dynasty(1644-1911), the Roman Empire disappeared forever after living for only 503 year!
How come? In my naïve opinion, because of their cultural differences. With almost no human culture(人文 )of their own to speak of, all the Roman emperors ruled their subjects and the conquered by force, and whatever laws they made were used only to rule and punish them - most likely very similar to the Qin Dynasty’s(221 - 206 BCE)Legalist(法家)form of government. So, how could the conquered ones choose to become Romans?
In China, when the Han Dynasty came to power, it followed the Qin’s Legalist practice for quite a while - more or less like the Roman Empire.
However, lucky for the Han emperors, before they came to power, China had become a unified country under the Qin Dynasty’s central govenment without feudal states anymore, and the Chinese language in its written form was made the same in nearly all the lands owned and conquered by its Founding Emperor, By the way, the land size under his rule was about the size of today’s China Proper which is about a fifth of Europe in size.
size.
As a result, this made it easier for Han emperors to spread Confucius‘s
(557? - 479 BCE)teachings. Long before this time, running a feudal state, the first emperor of the Zhou Dynasty( 1122-256 BCE)came up with his so-called “Mandate of Heaven”(天命), based on a verse in the nearly 4,000-years-old “Song of Five Sons”
(五子之歌)which reads, “People are the foundation of a state. When the foundation becomes firm and solid, the state will be in peace and harmony,” but neither he nor any one in his court knew how to build such a foundation. Fortunately, 500 some years later came Confucius and his idea of a Datong Society(大同, Great Harmony)for the people, as attached here below, which could create a“firm and solid foundation” for a state.
Surprisingly, it may be noted that the kind of welfare benefits mentioned here read almost like the human rights found in today’s Universal Declaration of Human Rights; however, in a Confucian world, they are to be provided by the ruler as his duty.
So, around 140 BCE, the ruling emperor decided to replace the Legalist form with the Confucianist kind of government where human-heartedness and justice(仁义)ruled from the top to the bottom with the emperor as its role model or family head. In the meantime, a palace test system( 殿试 )based on Confucius’s teachings was introduced for hiring the common people to fill government jobs. As a result, less and less royal family members and aristocrats were used for government service, and they were replaced by men with virtue and talent who had successfully passed the palace tests. This kind of governing system lasted until about 600 CE when the Sui Dynasty(589 - 618)came to power. By then, just about all the Han people or Chinese, had learned to write the Chinese characters in their standard forms. So, it replaced the old palace tests with the rigorous Imperial Examination System(科举制度)- the modern days’civil service examinations. And, this system lived with only occasional interruptions until the end of the Qing Dynasty in 1911.
Thus, Confucius has been almost nonstop in keeping China alive and active for more than 2,000 years! As a result, no millionaires have ever become top government officials since, by the Chinese tradition since time immemorial, the people are divided into four classes:the scholars, the farmers. the artisans and the merchants or businessmen. Had the Italians had some human culture or a political philosopher like China’s Confucius or even perhaps Greece’s Socrates(469 - 399 BCE), a large number of Europeans could now be called Romans besides the ones living in Italy today. And the Latin or Italian could be the language for at least a quarter of the Europeans.
The Communists took power and established the People’s Republic in 1949. Not knowing exactly what a Marxist or Communist society ought to look like and how its people live, so following Mao’s death and the breakup of his horrible Cultural Revolution, they began a few years later to peddle and spread Confucianism by funding and supporting more than 500 Confucius centers, institutes and academies throughout the world. There are nearly 50 of them in the US alone!
In this way, the People’s Republic appears to be announcing to the world that she will now live by Confucius’s teachings or standards. And like the earlier dynasties, she now accepts the Mandate of Heaven and will try to build his Datong Society for the Chinese people!
相关栏目:『百家论坛
为什么时下中国很难出现真正的哲学家 2024-11-16 [84]
诺贝尔奖院士工作站介绍 2024-11-16 [69]
《乡下人的悲歌》读书笔记 2024-11-12 [174]
简单直接:特朗普当选,对我们影响最大的是这几点 2024-11-12 [193]
特朗普大获全胜,说明美国人对政治正确已经深恶痛绝 2024-11-12 [149]
也许特朗普并不可怕,可怕的是你只看到他们想让你看到的特朗普! 2024-11-12 [154]
特朗普胜选演讲里特别感谢的这位女性是谁? 2024-11-12 [149]
全世界都在蹲特朗普曝光萝莉岛大瓜 2024-11-12 [166]
任正非最新讲话:世界走向人工智能潮流是不可阻挡的! 2024-11-06 [322]
中国教育正走向恶性循环 2024-11-06 [364]
相关栏目更多文章
最新图文:
:浙江财经大学国际青年学者论坛的邀请函 (10/31-11/1) :美国加大审查范围 北大多名美国留学生遭联邦调查局质询 :天安门广场喜迎“十一”花团锦簇的美丽景象 马亮:做院长就能够发更多论文?论文发表是不是一场“权力的游戏”? :印裔人才在美碾压华裔:我们可以从印度教育中学到什么? :北京452万人将从北京迁至雄安(附部分央企名单) :《2019全球肿瘤趋势报告》 :阿尔茨海默病预防与干预核心讯息图解
更多最新图文
更多《即时通讯》>>
R.L.说:留言于2013-09-10 09:16:57(第3条)
China's Magic?
Not long ago, Larry one of our learned members, posted an article from the China Daily entitled, "China''s Magic," on our Overseas Chinese website called . It sketched the political, economic and social "miracles" taking place on the mainland during the past 60 years in spite of all the dire and gloomy predictions from those so-called foreign and Chinese experts.
Magic? What is magic to me is not what is described in this paper, but China’s action to fund and spread Confucianism all over the world.
You see, China is the one and only country or nation in the world that has a longest-living civilization which is built upon Confucius's teachings - uninterrupted for nearly 2,000 years, except for the short 27 years when Chairman Mao Zedong was in power.
The same paper reported recently that by July, 2009, China already had 331 Confucian centers or institutes in 83 countries to fund and support. And the US alone now has more than 40! It is projected that by 2010 there will be 500 Confucian "missionaries" in the world.
No Chinese rulers before ever dared to propagate Confucianism to foreign countries, perhaps for fear that the aliens, after having learned what Confucius taught, could judge them according to his standards. For instance, did the Chinese leaders behave like virtuous or Confucian gentlemen (Junzi) or treat foreign countries with human-heartedness (Ren) and justice (Yi) as Mencius advised in their conduct of foreign affairs? Nevertheless, many young Japanese, Korean and Vietnamese scholars swarmed to China to learn it anyway as early as the 7th century when Confucianism completely dominated China by then.
But, what the PRC leaders are now doing is to openly turn China into a real Confucian state. As role models, they will have to behave and work like virtuous or Confucian gentlemen. If so, what a magic!
In the meantime, from what little I have read and studied, I am amazed to discover that Jesus is almost like a communist whereas Confucius a socialist. While cussing the rich (e.g., Mt 19:24), Jesus took all his followers to be his brothers and mothers (e.g., Lk 8:19-21). Similarly, Confucius despised all the businessmen and merchants and placed them at the bottom of China''s social class.
In the meantime, he asked his followers "not to regard as their own parents only their own parents nor treat as their own children only their own children" in his Datong Society (Book of Rites) which is rather socialistic.
I am real happy that PRC leaders are now coming back to follow Confucius''s teachings, striving to build a real Confucian state with adequate defensive military power. In short, they seem to have adopted the old May 4th maxim which reads: "While the Western knowledge or culture is good for application and utilization, the Chinese knowledge or culture must serve as the basis for check and balance."
Rdh说:留言于2013-09-10 04:18:48(第2条)
Dear Tony:

Although raised in the Confucian tradition, I am no scholar at all, but a retired research physicist once engaged in testing and tracking rockets in my working days. I became highly interested in Confucianism when I read on the internet that the Chinese Commies are now funding and supporting more than 500 Confucius institutions throughout the world. The US alone has more than 40 of them!
If you are truly interested in Confucianism, here is where you can read and study Confucianism: . It is not a religion! You can improve and change what he teaches. As a matter of fact, he encourages you to keep on reading and studying other writings in order to find new ideas and thoughts?
He teaches you how to become a virtuous gentleman (Junzi), a leader and a son - having nothing to do with politics at all.
I am sorry to read that those so-called International Confucian scholars are not able to properly answer your questions.
Attached here is the paper that you asked for, and I hope to hear your comment.
I have a couple of other papers about Confucianism. If you’d like to read and discuss them, I’d be very happy to send them to you.

Regards,
Richard
Tony P.说:留言于2013-09-10 04:17:26(第1条)
I read your dissertation with interest in regard to the comparison of Eastern and Western social political philosophy. I would like to read a copy of your essay, no Confucius no China. I recently went to participate in a seminar where a panel of 6 International Confucian scholar (Assoc Prof and up class) spoke about Confucianism and whether it can be a universal truth. I raised 2 questions, on compatibility, (1) how can the monks reconcile filial piety with no off-springs and (2) how can Confucianism blend with or influence Western democratic thoughts if it is a universal truth?l I believe the panel did not properly answer my questions.
 
打印本文章
 
您的名字:
电子邮件:
留言内容:
注意: 留言内容不要超过4000字,否则会被截断。
未 审 核:  是
  
关于我们联系我们申请加入后台管理设为主页加入收藏
美国华裔教授专家网版权所有,谢绝拷贝。如欲选登或发表,请与美国华裔教授专家网联系。
Copyright © 2024 ScholarsUpdate.com. All Rights Reserved.