|
| 共13779条评论，每页10条，当前第510/1378页 |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Wind Information  留言于2014-08-20 05:18:41 |
|
|
|
评论：《即时通讯》周电—2014年第20期（6/23-7/10） |
|
|
Wind Information USA Sales/Marketing Job Description
Company Background:
Wind Information, headquartered in Shanghai, is the leading integrated service provider of Chinese financial data, information, and software. Our primary product is a financial database, which includes data on stocks, funds, bonds, FX, insurance, futures, derivatives, commodities, and macroeconomic and financial news.
In less than 20 years Wind has grown to become the clear market leader in China, and serves more than 90% of the financial enterprises in the Chinese market: including securities firms, fund management firms, insurance companies, banks, and investment firms. Our data are frequently quoted by Chinese and English media, in research reports, and in academic theses.
We’re excited to open our first international office in Manhattan, and we’re looking for candidates who want to be on the cutting edge of the Western World’s participation in China’s capital markets.
What’s in it for you?
o You have a great brand and product behind you: 90% of Chinese institutional investors are already our clients
o You would leverage the Wind brand to grow your contacts to include anyone and everyone with an interest in the Chinese economy
o You have a chance to develop with a company poised for tremendous growth
The ideal candidate will at a minimum have:
o A startup mentality: thinks outside of the box, and is unfazed by quickly changing responsibilities
o Strong relationship development skills: a person of high integrity
o Experience in sales or marketing that you could leverage to develop the US market
The ideal candidate would really blow us away if he or she:
o Has existing relationships with potential clients such as institutional investors, research groups, universities, and government organizations
o Understands China’s capital markets and economy
If you have an interest in joining the Wind USA team, please contact:
Brandon Emmerich
54 West 40th Street, New York, NY, 10018
Cell: (612) 239-3869
Email: Brandon.Emmerich@wind.com.cn
*Wind information is an equal opportunity employer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
y.c.ni 留言于2014-08-20 02:22:37 |
|
|
|
评论：UPDATE - From The Chinese American Professors and Professionals Network（2014 No.21） |
|
|
小分子梯次双靶广谱抗癌诊疗新法简介
近十多年来分子靶向抗癌药发展令人瞩目。人们已经从如图所示癌细胞内纵横交错的分子信号通路中找出了一些相对具有肿瘤特异性的靶点，开发出了能够治疗小部分靶点阳性表达癌症病人的抗癌药。但很快发现会有病人耐药，肿瘤复发。几种靶向药合用或与传统化疗药连用，改善有限。另据内行透露，这种举全球之力、有千万人参与的寻找肿瘤特异性靶点的努力越来越难，似乎已快穷尽。
为何这条新路也难尽人意？因为这是从根本上由癌症的biology决定的。先用以下图解看看当下主流正统的抗癌研究思路，诸位有何感想？
话说癌症最大的生物学特征是多变或叫异质性，表现在病人、肿瘤、细胞、基因、分子等不同层面上，其超乎想象的复杂程度仍在不断认识中。所以用一个或多个分 子靶向抗癌药是难以解决大问题的，因为存在不同层面上的耐药和逃逸机制。对这一主流研究方向尽管并不看好，但不排斥，也愿乐观其成。同时琢磨自己不同的思 路和解决办法，这大概没错或允许吧？ 如何绕过恶性肿瘤多变而错综复杂的分子信号通路生态系统，开发一种广谱且使癌细胞更难逃逸和耐药的抗癌方法？我们进行了多年的努力和尝试。既然肿瘤细胞本身很tough难以直接搞定，何尝不采取迂回战术，以貌似不直接与癌细胞交锋其实却更有力、更彻底的方式消灭它们？
2. 恶性肿瘤生态系统中有一薄弱环节可以利用。癌细胞为了促进自身的疯长，会诱发产生供应自身氧气和养分的生死攸关的肿瘤血管。这些特征相同 的血管存在于不同类型的实体肿瘤内 (注意：这里已为”广谱” 埋下伏笔!），它们不是由癌细胞构成，所以不是那么多变和难缠。但是，由于这些血管是匆忙粗制滥造而成，结构上有重大缺陷，容易遭受一种小分子血管靶向药 物（VDAs：如源自于非洲灌木柳的CA4P）的攻击，造成选择性肿瘤血管闭塞，大量肿瘤细胞因缺血而发生坏死，如下方这例病理切片所示。
3. 但是这类具有明确广谱抗癌作用的VDAs临床试验（无论单用还是与化疗、分子靶向药合用）的疗效最终却都不理想，因为受邻近正常血管滋养的周边残留癌细胞 受缺氧刺激会快速分裂繁殖，造成肿瘤复发。所以尽管已开发了几十年，相对安全的VDAs迄今未获FDA批准商业开发，说到底就是不管用。 OncoCiDia 或曰小分子梯次双靶广谱抗癌诊疗新法就是在上述VDA造成的肿瘤大块坏死的基础上，利用另外一个极具坏死亲和性的天然小分子金丝桃素（源自于西方最常用的 草药贯叶连翘或叫St John''''s wort）将明确具有诊治癌症作用的放射性碘-131导入瘤内，犹如导弹带上核弹头，局部定点靶向放疗，杀死残余的癌细胞。OncoCiDia只需两药隔 夜各静脉注射一针，作用可持续数周至数月。治疗全程可用核医学影像记载，同时还能发现正在被治疗中的原发或转移性肿瘤。所以叫做小分子梯次双靶广谱抗癌诊 疗新法。
发明OncoCiDia的中心思想是：因为Cancer Biology超复杂，用纯生物学的手段很困难，而宜迂回绕过其多变难缠的生态系统，适当辅以直截了当的物理手段如放射线。打一个极端的比方，你能在原子 弹核爆范围内发现任何形式的生命吗？对再顽强的癌细胞、肿瘤干细胞等等均格杀勿论，这在一定程度上克服了肿瘤耐药和复发。当然，如何使这种靶向作用更精准，做到只杀癌细胞少伤好细胞则正是我们当下的工作。而OncoCiDia中的关键技术突破点则是被这里某些人嗤之以鼻的20 多年前对坏死亲和性物质的重大发现 (注意：这为”广谱”提供了另一保障!）。确实，要是没有长期以来在 NIH Syndrome (自己上网查定义) 驱使下的阻挠和打压，该抗癌法或许早就开始造福人类了。说不定一些重要人物如磁共振造影剂之父或苹果之父乔布斯的生命或能得以保全。当然，不是说现在 OncoCiDia就一定能够开发出来，还得看我们人类是否deserve。
4. 总结了小分子梯次双靶广谱抗癌诊疗新法的工作原理。貌似太简单了吧？但是不要忘记 beauty lies in simplicity，好方法应该是相对简单可行的。需要再次强调OncoCiDia只是诸多抗癌尝试之一，它不能代替但可补足其它现有疗法。尤其是当它被证明安全有效时应该有 其一席之地，给广大癌症病患多一个选择。诸位看法如何？ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ChineseHometown 留言于2014-08-20 01:34:11 |
|
|
|
评论：UPDATE - From The Chinese American Professors and Professionals Network（2014 No.21） |
|
|
圣迭戈科技界社区联谊盛会（多图）
http://www.sandiegochinesepress.com/press/?p=122929
周末：我们来啦！
http://www.sandiegochinesepress.com/press/?p=123035
中国海外华文教育名师中文教师免费培训圣迭戈第一站
http://www.sandiegochinesepress.com/press/?p=122590
猥琐银行抢匪被监视录像（图）
http://www.sandiegochinesepress.com/press/?p=123066
2014“中华文化大乐园”进入美国南加州 广受当地青少年喜爱
http://www.sandiegochinesepress.com/press/?p=122798
联邦法院驳回日本右翼激进派反对加州格伦代尔市“慰安妇”雕像案
http://www.sandiegochinesepress.com/press/?p=122600
San Diego Chinese Press
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. Pan, Ph.D. 留言于2014-08-20 00:22:11 |
|
|
|
评论：《神州学人》编辑部欢迎您的见解：对“世界级”科研突破的标准及判断 |
|
|
Here are my comments:
1， 您心目中“世界级”科研突破的标准。
There would be few event that could be qualified as such because any great discovery is a result of being accumulative and incremental in the eyes of true researchers (note: I purposefully avoid from using the term of scientists here)
2， 近年来，您所从事的研究领域中有哪些“世界级”科研突破？有哪些是中国人（华人）取得的？
First, there is hardly any break-through research qualifying as the "world-class." Please reconsider the usage of this kind of fancy words in scientific inquiry. Second, a publication in a tire-1 or -A journal in one''s own field is a qualifier to measure a contribution made to the research inquiry in a given field. Third, whether a
tier-1 or -A journal publication is a true measure for the so-called world class still remains questionable because most such journals are English language based, subject to somewhat biased review against those studies done and written by people of non-native English.
3， 您对于潘建伟、颜宁、施一公等在中国取得的“世界级”科研突破的看法？
Congratulations to all of them and many others. They all have published in a tier-1 or -A journal of their own field, so have done by many other researchers in their own field. Again, knowledge is
built upon being accumulative and incremental. To put it into
another light, if China can fund any research team who have adopted the same high rigor in research method, procedure, and standard as those three scientists have done (Note: I purposefully use scientists here to give them of my respect), that team will,be able to achieve the similar with a high probability. Research is dependent upon 1% of luck, and 99% of hard work as said by Einstein (?), plus sufficient funding in Chinese context, assuming to be with the high rigor in method, procedure, and standard etc.
4， 您个人在中国或国外的科研经历和感受，意见。
To be truthful in whatever one''s doing. However, being truthfulness is a relative term in locations.
5， 如果您回国来从事科研，您最重视哪个方面（如科研环境），请讲一讲您关于此的故事。
Not only 科研环境, but also 社会大环境。
6， 对于未来中国、中国科学家在科研领域取得“世界级”突破，您有什么判断，为什么？
Using the term of the “世界级”突破," researchers in China (Note: they could include researchers of other nationalities working in China) have done great work in scientific inquiry for many years in the history, and accomplished a lot in fields that have been recognized and benefited by the rest of the world; please let our colleagues in China do whatever they are interested in doing research in their own field, "feed" and "room" them well so to let them not worry too much about their own basic survival need, equip them with sufficient resources by the high rigor in research method, procedure, and standard in scientific inquiry AND social context, the “世界级”突破 will come naturally, although they do not have to be published in the current
tier-1 or A journals of English language. Being truthfulness to oneself, and let whatever one has done judged by time and others. Why need in a hurry to announce we have the “世界级”突破?
7， 您的其他宝贵想法。
Personally, I want my takes and thoughts be invaluable, rather than being measure with a value. :-)
【注】这期专题文章，只要言之有理，无论“冷水”“热水”，我们皆热烈欢迎，即付稿酬。
The last statement shows the evidence in a different mentality in academia between China and the mainstream of north America. (1) As the job for a journal, you are supposed to welcome any manuscript that can be classified as pros or cons, or as what you have described as 无论“冷水”“热水.” People take this for granted. And (2) Personally, I don''t think that anyone in the circle of my colleagues on the Scholars'' Ne… |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Bruce 留言于2014-08-20 00:10:43 |
|
|
|
评论：《神州学人》编辑部欢迎您的见解：对“世界级”科研突破的标准及判断 |
|
|
1， 您心目中“世界级”科研突破的标准。
世界级科研突破的标准应该符合如下几个标准，
首先，在本领域中突破了最前沿的科学界限。其次，在本领域的顶级专家的一致肯定，第三，经得起一个科学研究领域周期的验证。
2， 近年来，您所从事的研究领域中有哪些“世界级”科研突破？有哪些是中国人（华人）取得的？
我不是一位科学家，但我从事了一个前人都没有做的工作，利用近五年时间，将世界顶级大学美国杜克大学作为机构引入江苏昆山，这项目工作在近十几年中，全球海外办学的200多所机构中，单体规模最大的世界顶级大学落户中国的先例，这将对中国学者在科学研究进入世界级水准有着十分特殊意义。
3， 您对于潘建伟、颜宁、施一公等在中国取得的“世界级”科研突破的看法？
中国13亿人口的大国，海外留学人员达250万，回国不到40%，类似他们这些优秀的科研人才回国的甚少，而且，绝大部分优秀人才还留在海外，我们国家应该反思。
5， 如果您回国来从事科研，您最重视哪个方面（如科研环境），请讲一讲您关于此的故事。
作为一位科研人员，特别是高级的优秀的科研人员，最大的理想是在本领域做出科研上的突破，最重视的是国家对科研人员的重视程度，国内的社会环境，对一流科研人员的各种功能配套。
6， 对于未来中国、中国科学家在科研领域取得“世界级”突破，您有什么判断，为什么？
我认为对中国科学家在科研领域的世界级发展是一个长期挑战的过程，个别或部分优秀人才做出一些突破也是正常的，但是，真正形成一个气氛和一定的规模的人才群，时间还会特别慢长。纵观世界科学发展历史，获得世界诺贝尔科学奖的比例绝大多数在世界一流大学中产生的。从1901年该奖成立以来到2009年的统计，美国大学中前十位大学获得该奖的447名，其它大学获得该奖329名，这些大学都是在美国大学排名前50所大学，，英国总计207位，其中剑桥81，牛津38名，伦敦大学19名，帝国理工18名，爱丁堡9名。其它8所大学共 33名，科学研究机构才 1名，而我们国家的的一流大学和世界一流大学的差距巨大。可以想象，我们国家科研发展的世界级突破还有多么长的时间。
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Angel Care 留言于2014-08-19 13:19:56 |
|
|
|
评论：UPDATE - From The Chinese American Professors and Professionals Network（2014 No.21） |
|
|
The 47th Joint School Science Exhibition
Opening and Closing Ceremonies Invitation
Venue : Lecture Theater , Hong Kong Central Library
Date : Fri. 22. Aug. 2014.
10:30 a.m. - 11:00 a.m. Welcome Reception
11:00 a.m. - 12:30 a.m. Opening Ceremony
Date : Wed. 27. Aug. 2014.
11:00 a.m. - 11:30 a.m. Welcome Reception
11:30 a.m. - 12:45 a.m. Closing Ceremony
WWW.JSSE.ORG.HK
~ Angel Care ~ Angel ~ Gathering
6:00p.m.~9:00p.m. Sat.23.30.&Sun..24.31.Aug.
Flat23,21F,BlockA,FontanaGardens,KaNingPath,H.K.
Everyone Welcome ! Pls bring food & beverage to share !
Date : Mon. 29. Sep. 2014.
5 : 30 p.m. - Welcome Reception
7 : 00 p.m. - Speech of Prof. Albert Chan
8 : 00 p.m. - Donation Ceremony & Group photos
WWW.HKBU.EDU.HK
+85252116680 truly sincerely
Live Simply ! Love Generously ! Speak Kindly !
Thank you very much ! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Daniel Tao 留言于2014-08-19 11:16:51 |
|
|
|
评论：UPDATE - From The Chinese American Professors and Professionals Network（2014 No.21） |
|
|
美國洛杉磯空軍大鵬聯誼會主辦2014年加州麗都市『國慶升旗靈氣之旅』
10月9日(星期四)至10月11日(星期六)三天兩夜遊
10/09(四) 09：30AM San Gabriel、10：00AM Rowland Hts- -車上簡餐, 晚餐buffet-- Harrahs casino laughlin (宿)
10/10(五) 飯店早餐-07：50 AM開車--- --needles (升旗桿剪綵、十時十分升旗典禮)中午與needles市府官員會餐，參觀市區---晚餐buffet –flagstaff flagstaff(宿)
10/11(六) 飯店早餐-0800 開車—-Sedona (bell rock)、 叮噹車---(中餐自理)逛藝術禮品街—晚餐Seafood Buffet
預計10月11日(星期六)晚上10時三十分回到Rowland Hts、11時回到San Gabriel。
團費包含2早餐、2午餐、3晚餐、2晚住宿、Sedona 叮噹車、每日瓶裝水、豪華巴士、司機、導遊小費。參加旅遊者每人獲贈精美禮品乙份、年刊乙份及大鵬精美名牌。即日起報名，名額有限額滿為止，請儘速報名，截止日期為9月10日。
支票抬頭: Ms. Agnes Chiang (洛杉磯空軍大鵬聯誼會財務理事)
支票與報名表請 寄至: 5916 Walnut Grove Ave, San Gabriel, CA 91775
若有疑問 請與空軍大鵬聯誼會各聯絡人詢問更多資訊 :
(Tel) 626-292-7888 626-731-3612
(Cell) 949-310-6858 951-214-8219
請儘快報名. 謝謝! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SAGE 留言于2014-08-19 06:47:04 |
|
|
|
评论：UPDATE - From The Chinese American Professors and Professionals Network（2014 No.21） |
|
|
Pedagogy in Health Promotion: The Scholarship of Teaching and Learning - Call for Reviewers
Are you serious about improving the teaching of professionals who work in health care, public health and health promotion? We have a job for you... Be a reviewer for the first major journal dedicated to the broad topic of pre-service and continuing education of health professionals involved in health promotion and public health.
Pedagogy in Health Promotion: The Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (PHP) advances pedagogy through contributions in areas such as curriculum and course/program design, assessment, and administration relevant to teaching and learning. The content of the journal is especially relevant to instructors or trainers who provide continuing professional education, in the broad arena of health promotion and disease prevention. The quarterly journal welcomes works addressing the art and science of teaching and learning, and how it contributes to the formation and ongoing development of the health promotion professional working in any site and with a range of populations. We are accepting works of original research, descriptive best practices, commentaries, coaching articles, and thoughtful questions and ideas related to the pedagogy of preparing and continuing to develop those working in health promotion. Applicants should meet the following minimum requirements:
• Have more than a passing interest in the planning, implementation, and evaluation of your teaching
• Have had more than seven peer reviewed articles published; three must be in the area of teaching and learning
• At least a master’s degree in a relevant field
• Understand the basics to the field of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning
• Be able to provide useful, constructive, professional, and appropriate comments to colleagues submitting works for publication
• Meet deadlines to give authors a timely response and feedback to their work
Those in professional continuing education and workforce development are encouraged to apply. Those with inter-professional experience in teaching will be very helpful.
The high quality of the articles that appear in PHP directly relate to the expertise and dedication of our reviewers. This type of service is eligible for continuing education contact hours for Health Education Specialists certification and may be for other health professions. Each year, reviewers are acknowledged in an issue of the journal.
For consideration as a peer reviewer send cover letter and CV to Dr. Stephen Gambescia, Editor-in-Chief, PHP, at sfg23@drexel.edu. State in your cover letter your experience as matched in the criteria listed above, your general interest in the area of Pedagogy, and your specific areas of expertise. After a review of your materials and if you are selected, you will be asked to complete a profile account in our Scholar One manuscript review system.
Pedagogy in Health Promotion: The Scholarship of Teaching and Learning is one of three peer-reviewed journals published by the Society for Public Health Education (SOPHE). Others include Health Education & Behavior and Health Promotion Practice. PHP is the first major journal dedicated to the broad topic of pre-service and continuing education of health professionals involved in health promotion and public health.
Website: http://www.sagepub.com/php/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 共13779条评论，每页10条，当前第510/1378页 |
|
|
|
|
|
