|
| 共13779条评论，每页10条，当前第668/1378页 |
|
|
|
|
 |
David P  留言于2013-10-27 18:40:46 |
|
|
|
评论：ABC必须立即停播吉米・金梅尔的极端种族主义节目，并做出正式道歉 |
|
|
The aired program is for sure NOT within the protection of freedom of speech pertinent to commercial messages. The bottom line is to file a suit against ABC and the host for monetary damages and/or injunction. It could be a class action suit one as many people are similarly situated. The best the U.S. goverment could do is to cite ABC and its subsidary stations with a fine under the certain federal laws that prohibits the promotion of violence or racially hatred conduct, similarly to the Janet Jackson incident for exposure at the Super Bowl years ago, evey affiliated TV stations got fined individually by the U.S. government. |
|
|
|
|
YJ Liang 留言于2013-10-26 14:24:14 |
|
|
|
评论：ABC必须立即停播吉米・金梅尔的极端种族主义节目，并做出正式道歉 |
|
|
I don't want to talk about this any more. I don't have an American dream. I am a temporary worker here. I enjoy living in US but I decided to move to UK after couple of years.
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
Lora 留言于2013-10-26 14:19:01 |
|
|
|
评论：ABC必须立即停播吉米・金梅尔的极端种族主义节目，并做出正式道歉 |
|
|
Fighting for our children is exactly why so many of us feel the need to speak up. Ideally, we should be at peace with everyone in the society. Fighting for our rights sometimes does have the risk of alienating us from other groups of people. However, the reality in a multi-ethnic and multi-cultural society is that everyone needs to speak up or even push the envelope to get understanding and respect. Plus, the culture in the U.S. is that if you don’t speak up and let others know your boundary, you are invisible, or marginalized. There is a saying in America “squeaky wheel gets the grease”. If you are working in a corporate situation surrounded by the majority Americans, you will know what this means.
11 years in the U.S. is not long. It takes about 20 years to really get to know the U.S., how things work, how to survive here. Sometimes that is not even long enough. Many Chinese don’t socialize with the local Americans all their lives here. So they don’t know how Americans think, don’t even know when they are being insulted, or treated unfairly. Chinese have a very high tolerance for mistreatment, and discrimination. Many tend to suffer silently, or take the high road thinking the fight is too petty, beneath them. Remember 阿Q？ So little by little, over time, anyone can step on our toes, insult us, or even threaten to kill us.
That’s what’s at stake here. I suggest you read the history book “People’s History of United States”. You will understand how American Indians lost their land, lost their lives, and got to where they are today. They were not united. They didn’t have sophisticated organization. They didn’t have leadership. They didn’t fight smartly. Now they are pushed to little patches of land called Indian Reservations.
Now that may have dampened your American dream a bit. But that’s the reality you have to deal with. The sooner you wake up to it, the better prepared you are. I was like you over 20 years ago, full of idealism, full of worship for the “American Way”. Waking up has been painful. But I think it is called growth and maturity. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UCLA Center for Chinese Studies 留言于2013-10-26 00:24:31 |
|
|
|
评论：《即时通讯》周电—2013年第32期（9/12-9/19） |
|
|
Muslim Ritual and the Chinese Building System
Lecture by Nancy Steinhardt, University of Pennsylvania
Friday, November 01, 2013
2:00 PM - 4:30 PM
10383 Bunche Hall
This lecture explores what happens when a monotheistic, aniconic, foreign religion needs worship space in China, a civilization in which images had been worshiped in temples and caves for hundreds of years before the arrival of Islam. The unique convergence of Muslim ritual and the Chinese building system is explained through extant mosques from the fourteenth through the nineteenth centuries, as well as a few Muslim tombs. Mosques on China’s southeastern coast, famous mosques in the cities Xi’an and Beijing, and little known mosques in Henan province and Muslim autonomous counties of China are all included in this seminar.
UCLA Center for Chinese Studies
Tel: (310) 825-8683
Fax: (310) 206-3555
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
QJZ 留言于2013-10-25 07:50:30 |
|
|
|
评论：ABC必须立即停播吉米・金梅尔的极端种族主义节目，并做出正式道歉 |
|
|
對華人社區抗議ABC和要求道歉的行動，爾灣加大教授陳勇表示「應該採取一切和平、非暴力方式抗議」。陳勇指出，對於說出這句話的六歲孩童，華人社區不需要反應過度，而且應看到這種言論並不反映美國政府對華政策或主流社會的態度，然而對於直接將節目播出的ABC須強烈抗議，「言論自由不代表可以允許公然發表這類種族主義言論」，這一言論也不符合自文藝復興以來西方資本主義經濟的核心精神——規則和信用，「欠債不想還錢？遊戲規則不是這麼玩的，也不符合西方資本主義一貫強調的信用經濟」。
看看德国人是怎么看待中国的 - 德国军事专家对中国军事的评论:
伯格教授：“你知道我是个陆军历史专家，谈到海军的时候并不多，因此就我目前所了解的简单谈谈。的确中国军事学者的观点大多出于美国提供的观点与研究结果，其中当然有许多是美国人有意释放出来的，这造成了中国学者跟着美国意图思考的弊病。德国军事教育一直有自己独特的风格，这与德国的民族主义与民族性有很大关系，这也让德国在二战中付出了惨重代价。
我父亲直到去世那天还戴着当兵时的手表，而且时间指针永远停在当年进攻苏联的那一刻，这种情结让德国与美国和俄国都保持着某种距离。德国人承认二战罪行，但不承认自己比苏联人或美国人差，而日本人表面不肯承认罪行，但内心对美国、俄国乃至中国有深刻恐惧感。中国年轻军事学者不但与西方军事教育脱节，而且也与中国老一辈军事家思想脱节，其中明显一点就是缺少必胜精神，顾忌太多，自己吓唬自己。如今中国学者们在思考国际力量对比时常犯一个错误，那就是没有学会从对手的角度看问题，一味强调自身的弱点而畏惧对抗，这本身就是中了对手的讹诈之策。 就保卫钓鱼岛战略而言，中国人并没有看清美日对中国的恐惧，处处强调韬晦，这导致丧失战略主动权” 。
那小兵：“ 您很理解这种状况。您研究克劳塞维茨军事思想非常有成就，他的军事战略思想是整个西方军事思想的基础，请您从战略与战术层面给中国读者谈谈如何运用西方军事思想保卫钓鱼岛与南海吧。"
伯格教授：“首先，应当了解中国的对手战略意图，然后评估对方的战斗意志与方式，再然后评估敌我实力对比，之后才能制定战略战术。我们明白战争是政治的继续。在任何情况下，都不应把战争看成独立的东西，而要看作是政治的工具，是为政治服务的。战争爆发之后，并未脱离政治，仍是政治交往的继续，是政治交往通过另一种手段的实现，是打仗的政治，是以剑代笔的政治。美英两国在二战中就建立了所谓“ 围堵欧亚大陆” 的战略同盟，那时对手是德国，德国与苏联交火让英美趁机攻入，最终德国失败。
在二战后，那时的假设敌人包括了俄国与中国这两个潜在超级大国，一旦其中一个大国与其他一个大国开战，美国就将选其中一个联合制服另一个，从而用最低成本掌控两个超级大国。美国对于俄国和中国的经济与军事战略围堵计划依然有效，但其中外部情况发生了变化，美国有些不知所措。这个战略弱点有两个：一是伊斯兰国家的崛起造成西方文化与东方文化冲突升级，这带来了从来未有过的新挑战(这一点个人认为是未来第三次世界大战的根源，编者注);二是欧盟、俄、中三国相互依赖加强，美、英、日联合向心力减弱.
美国十分担心俄国与中国会因为发生动乱而走向伊斯兰式极端主义，故此并不敢相逼太甚，而且会继续制约日本与韩国的军事冒险。很大程度上，美国不敢真正触动中国的霍姆斯海峡与马六甲海峡生命线，担心中国背水一战造成美日韩战线彻底被摧毁。美国从中国历史中得出一个结论：每次中国打仗就会促进民族大团结，同时解决贫富不均等社会问题，中央集权相应大大加强，相比之下，美国日本韩国这些民主国家主动发动战争将极大的激怒国民。因此美国希望中国继续和平演变而对美国有利。
中国对于保卫钓鱼岛不必担心美国真正介入，但可以适当选择时机给美国面子出来调停。从经济学角度讲，战争恢复能力比打赢战争本身更重要，看看德国与日本就是这样崛起的，再看看那些没有参战的南美洲国家，一个都没崛起，因为他们被既得利益集团拖住了” 。
伯格教授：“我读过一些中国现代军事著作，但觉得像《超限战》之类的作品都缺少军事战略思想格局的，太过拘泥于技术层面，显然受到了西方武器制胜论影响。就目前美俄中平衡的格局看，中国相对最强的战争要素就是武器，尤其是核武器，这就是不怕打输的底牌，这让对手们明白无论战争如何发展中国都不会输，更不会割地赔款。
中国最弱的是缺少实战经验和军事思想训练，在常规武器系统中缺少某些关键技术，但这些都可以通过实践迅速取得。因为中国对这些方面过多的顾忌，因此南海各国对中国不断讹诈，比如，越南每次向中国要钱之前必定先在南海制造事端，强化姿态，而后从中国把钱拿走，这和从前匈奴人逼迫中国提供物资钱粮有何区别.
菲律宾也在试图用同样的方式从中国得到好处。其实，我预料今后在钓鱼岛和南海更多出现的武器是“ 冷兵器” ，也就是装甲舰艇相互冲撞，这属于心理战范畴。日本人也在试图对中国实施心理战，他们正通过媒体与巡逻强化一个假象，那就是“ 日本对于钓鱼岛掌握实际控制权” ，我到想问问日本人在那茫茫大海上凭什么实际控制了钓鱼岛?难道中国船去和日本船去有不同吗?难道日本建立的岛上海防吗?日本人使用这个心理战术的原因是他们认定中国人是农耕民族，农耕民族往往误用陆地划分的思维划分海洋，让中国人心理上接受日本的战略主动权。
伯格教授：日本债务深重、韩国惧怕朝鲜、越南经济依赖中国、菲律宾是个变相美国殖民地、印度本身陷于民族与社会危机，故此中国相对是形势最好的国家，仍在上升之中，没有必要惧怕他们。
美国越是打压中国就越造成中国冷战思维加剧，这对于美国非常可怕。中国最可怕的就是畏惧本身，没有听说一个13亿人的国家整体怕失去朋友的，中国人民与中国人民就是最牢靠的盟友，比北约加上华沙国家人口更多。只要有“ 以战止战” 的决心，没有那个国家敢得罪中国，谁也不敢与永远无法消灭的中华民族战斗到底。
（个人愚见：假洋鬼子和蠢猪狗蛋，不属于中华民族。） |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sophia 留言于2013-10-25 07:46:13 |
|
|
|
评论：ABC必须立即停播吉米・金梅尔的极端种族主义节目，并做出正式道歉 |
|
|
"Kill all Chinese" is not acceptable. "Kill one Chinese" is not acceptable. "Kill any Chinese" is not acceptable. Move Chinese government, Chinese people would say:" Keep the money, we wave you". NO WAY! Period.
Go vote. No more...... |
|
|
|
|
Na P. 留言于2013-10-25 07:42:05 |
|
|
|
评论：ABC必须立即停播吉米・金梅尔的极端种族主义节目，并做出正式道歉 |
|
|
It is not hard to understand in as a COUNTRY, China did not gain much respect from most well developed countries because of the Chinese Government's uncharismatic leadership, destruction of Chinese culture and negative influences to its society as your idea of money brings respect was clearly from one of those just mentioned. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lora 留言于2013-10-25 07:38:43 |
|
|
|
评论：ABC必须立即停播吉米・金梅尔的极端种族主义节目，并做出正式道歉 |
|
|
YJ: You misunderstood what it means to live in the U.S. We are exercising our rights by protesting and we are not suffering. On the contrary, we are quite happy as we can do things like this. This is the only one of the two countries where an individual can sue the country. If you live here long enough, You will come to appreciate that and participate in things like this, hopefully.
It's ok to be critical of Chinese government. There are many things they
could improve on. But when the whole people of China, including us are
attacked, we need to be united, unless you don't consider yourself Chinese
anymore. If we don't, we as a people get NO respect, no matter how good the
Chinese government is.
I thought we set up this group separate from NJCCPS so that people can debate political issues thoroughly. But let’s not get back to attacking each other personally if there is disagreement. If you disagree, say what you disagree on, and why, but don’t do personal attacks. Let’s make this a rule so that we can all be elevated to be adults, and professional. Watch American politician debate. How they keep cool, no matter how each candidate disagrees with each other. But no one would attack personally. That’s called professional debate. Let’s learn to improve our style and manner.
Thank you. |
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
| 共13779条评论，每页10条，当前第668/1378页 |
|
|
|
|
|
